this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
706 points (96.4% liked)

memes

10705 readers
2290 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 163 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

The glee peasants are showing should make the 1% nervous

[–] [email protected] 74 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

I’ve been thinking that ever since that dumb “submarine” sank at the Titanic. I don’t feel particularly sorry for the people who died (other than the kid who apparently didn’t want to be there in the first place), but the outright glee I saw a lot of people express online was surprising.

It seems like there was a largely unspoken agreement among the wealthiest in the West throughout the middle of the 20th century, particularly in the aftermath of the Depression, World War II, and the rise of communism, that they wouldn’t try to extract the absolute maximum of wealth from the workers and try to keep a stable, happy middle class and even lower class that had a relatively comfortable existence without feeling too at risk of losing everything. As you get to the end of that century and into this century, the wealthiest forgot why that policy existed, newcomers didn’t understand it, or they decided they wanted to see how much more extraction they could get away with thinking they’ll be able to reign in any unrest before it gets too bad; probably some combination of those and other factors. It’s a dangerous game to play, though, and it seems like explosive moments are closer than the wealthy powers realize.

Not that I think there’s any real organizing power behind the scenes, just that in the past a lot of people came to a collective understanding of a system that could bring a lot of financial stability to a lot of people.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It seems like there was a largely unspoken agreement among the wealthiest in the West throughout the middle of the 20th century, particularly in the aftermath of the Depression, World War II, and the rise of communism, that they wouldn’t try to extract the absolute maximum of wealth from the workers and try to keep a stable, happy middle class and even lower class that had a relatively comfortable existence without feeling too at risk of losing everything.

Actually, the richest people in America were terrified of FDR and the New Deal, and even attempted a fascist coup in order to overthrow him. Fun fact, George W. Bush's grandfather, Prescott Bush, was implicated in it!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Smedley Butler was a goddamn hero and should've been the next president

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 weeks ago

Buddy look at the tax code post great depression. There was no agreement the government said fuck you pay them.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 weeks ago

As you get to the end of that century and into this century, the wealthiest forgot why that policy existed

The collapse of the Soviet Union removed the threat of an alternative and "proved" that capitalism was the superior ideology, pushing their confidence that they could do no wrong through the roof.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago

Not much formal organizing needs to happen, based on the way this particular CEO found out.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It seems like there was a largely unspoken agreement among the wealthiest in the West throughout the middle of the 20th century, particularly in the aftermath of the Depression, World War II, and the rise of communism, that they wouldn’t try to extract the absolute maximum of wealth from the workers and try to keep a stable

Thats because we stopped them, they always try as much as they are allowed to.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The deregulation of the 80s and 90s really screwed this country over.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Same with the UK and privatisation

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

In summary: Neoliberalism.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Neoliberals always surprise me, How do they think that more neoliberalism will fix problems caused by neoliberalism?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's "rein in any unrest". I'm not pointing this out to be a grammar nazi, but because "reign in" is an interesting slip in the context of your post.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I fully agree. If I were a billionaire, I would be "let's get a team together and come up with a strategy" levels of nervous. See, the 1% has sort of dehumanized themselves, by creating this decades-long narrative that they're this untouchable caste almost on the level of Demigods, and the closer you get to God, the further you get from Human. Now that one has been shot and killed in broad daylight in the middle of NYC, and again with the idiots on the homemade submarine, that narrative is obviously untrue. When a dragon is slain, we don't mourn its death, we cheer the Dragonslayer. So, if I were in the 1%, I'd be very worried about appearing all too human, all too quickly.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Doomsday bunkers were an obsession back in the 2000s for billionaires. If you think about their ideas from that framework it puts some of their stupid inventions into perspective. The cybertruck is the vehicle Musk would want to be in during a riot against him if he isn't on Mars at the time.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Considering how fragile it is, its the vehicle i hope he's in in a riot against him

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We are currently at a wealth disparity that outpaces the gap that precipitated the French Revolution and invention of the guillotine.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

What is happening in this meme?

[–] [email protected] 113 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

The meme is usually disapproval of something followed by approval of something that basically the same thing. The approval is of a CEO being murdered, but advocating violence is against the rules so the "approval" has been removed by moderators.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yep, someone mentioned on a post the ~~murderer~~ hero may never be named, I replied "Good" My comment was removed shortly after, so I recommented "Too bad, so sad"

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I say we start calling him Geralt.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Drake was unfortunately turned into a meme at some point in the past. There are alternatives available. Can I offer you a laforge version for your next meme?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago

"Removed by mod" means the comment was celebratory response.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago

The "happy drake" reaction is removed by mods, like comments about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Does anyone know who the shooter was? I want to send them roses.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 3 weeks ago

Nice try, NYPD

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sometimes things line up in a way that seems intentional.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh don't worry, they won't stop you from getting the anesthesia - they're just going to make you pay 1000% above the wholesale price of it. Which you can negotiate down just like Blue Cross does. Good luck with that though. Anyway who knows, maybe their CEO will go visit New York.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Looks like they reversed the decision. Can't imagine what convinced them to not go through with it.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago

They forgot "We're going to need prior authorization."

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

What do you think the chance is that this becomes a trend?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 weeks ago

If America went from school shootings to billionaire shootings I wouldn't be mad. Think billionaires can afford pretty good security details though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago

I mean, it really is the only thing left

load more comments
view more: next ›