this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
1121 points (99.2% liked)

memes

10697 readers
3214 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 125 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

That's basically how science works.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Scientist trash talking used be savage af.

Nowadays though there have been enough "trashed" theories that later turned out correct, that people have learned not to discount any possibility.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago

There's trash talking in the other direction that can be equally savage. Ever been to a research talk where someone raises their hand and says "actually, this is all trivial"? The worst thing you can hear after you spend months working your ass off on a project.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Heh, I was just listening to the Planet Money podcast today about extreme UV lithography, and how the scientist presenting felt mocked out of the room. Of course this was 2000 or so.

I'm unsure if this makes your point or disproves it. I'm leaning towards supports.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Oh I'm sure there's still some super mean spirited stuff that happens today, but it remains interpersonal and fairly private.

The old timey stuff was more like the kind where some scientist would go out of their way to straight up publicly slander people with ideas they thought were bad.

The modern equivalent would be like scientists calling each other "smooth brained" on twitter for proposing new theories that didn't immediately make sense.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 weeks ago

"great job improving the accuracy of determining a precise meter! Now let's get back to it and see if we can make it even more accurate!"

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 weeks ago

Umm actually, no because scientists are incentivised to be "nice" to each other for their career growth. It's a set of circlejerks.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 3 weeks ago

Wikipedia is a great and wonderful moment in human history.

But I understand that it can't be monetized so fascist will attac

[–] [email protected] 47 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Can see this in an old Batman tv show fight.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

I want this to be so much better than it is:

https://www.dropout.tv/um-actually

[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 weeks ago

They are also a nonprofit that, if everyone who used it paid $3, would cover the cost.

-Definitely Not Jimmy Whales

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s the closest thing to the Hitchhikers Guide we have

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But I miss the concept of the handheld unit with roughly 100 buttons on the front.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

3d printer and some wires n stuff.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 weeks ago

One another*

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago

That was one of the factors that helped it stick around, it started as an online dictionary you could link to, so you didn't have to write out an info dump every time somebody asked online about something. Even the biggest pages on there now all started out as small stubs written off from pages in school books. Though that's also what gained it a bit of reputation early on as it grew quicker than could be managed at times.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

facebook posters use this "urge to correct" on their advantage, posting minor mistakes intentionally in public groups, and since there is no thumbs down, it get promoted by means of getting lots of interaction

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

Same thing with post titles on 🤮reddit.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago

I'm one of the nerds btw

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It definitely wasn't nothing but that - you have to start with material to correct. For example, I didn't make this comment until this post came along.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago

It would be great if it was just the nerds, and none of the pages had funded contributors pushing their spin.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

Porn.
All six of them, just different forms of porn.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)
  • YouTube
  • Pornhub
  • Ebay
  • DeviantART
  • AO3
  • Archive.org

I dunno there's probably better choices but these were what I thought of. Is there a website that has a copy of every public domain music file?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Thepiratebay

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

I truly do not understand the Wikipedia editor grind but God bless all the brave soldiers fighting in the trenches

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

Sounds like physics in a way, a chaotic and random energy and focusing itself into positive work, creating something with order.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

They have played us like a fiddle!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Gaming the besserwisser for the common good.