this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
58 points (98.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2031 readers
929 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One reason to do something like this would be if you were planning to disrupt the international supply chain by perhaps putting tariffs on China, keeping local unions happy to the point where they would not jump on a chance to strike during a supply chain disruption would be an effective way to minimize the adverse effects of tariffs and wars for that matter.

You could also just read this as an appeal to union members who voted for Trump to keep them a part of the Republican coalition.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Isn’t “pro-union republican” an oxymoron?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They were one of the three House Republicans that voted for the Pro Act, the vast minority position among the party, which at least makes it interesting that they were picked, who knows how they will actually operate though

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not if said union and Republican are pro-bribes too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

More like not when the union is a police union.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Ooh, not at all :) We Spaniards still remember the Vertical Trade Union.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Another reason is that unions have been getting increasing support from the general population, reversing decades of declining support.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

needs a few for scripted, 'you're fired' episodes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wtf is with them using the word "taps". Not blaming you OP, it's clearly in the article's title. But I see it over and over and over again.

Not isolated, every time the stock market loses 2% is "plummets" or "plunges". Every time a fighter jet is sent to intercept something, it's "scrambled."

Like they all use the same lexicon.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As far as I'm aware, "taps" is a sports reference. As in, to tap somebody in.

Your other complaints aren't related.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I thought it referred to the colloquialism "a tap on the shoulder," but I looked that up on DDG and apparently it means "a request to resign." That's the opposite of what I inferred.

Suddenly, a John Scalzi book I recently read and which overused the phrase makes a lot more sense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

The sports reference could also mean to tap out, like in wrestling. I suppose the answer you got is pretty well in line with that