this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
396 points (94.4% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3774 readers
1534 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@[email protected] for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago

The only question I have about Discovery is: do you think Michael Burnham is ever capable of crying?

[–] [email protected] 66 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Don't get me started on ds9. A black captain? A trans lesbian officer? A gay interspecies couple? The federation using fear from war as an excuse to become a police state? Can't believe they made my colorful space communism show woke.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

I can't be the only one who remembers Trekkies legitimately bitching about Tuvok because "Vulcans aren't black."

Like... really? You've been there and checked this out for yourself? Or is it that most (and not even all) of the handful of Vulcans you saw so far were white?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You know what really grinds my gears about Vulcans? According to Trek lore their blood is green because they evolved using copper atoms to bind oxygen in the blood. But if that were the case they should have hemocyanin, and their blood should be blue.

I know for a certainty, however, that any inhabitable worlds we might find in the future will definitely look like a sound stage populated with Styrofoam boulders

Anyway, hardcore fans are dumb. I should know, I was one

[–] [email protected] 2 points 59 minutes ago

Not dumb, but it makes it impossible to love Star Trek for what it is. A goofy show that takes itself seriously about space socialism. And it's incredible at that.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Tuvok is the best depiction of a Vulcan in all of Star Trek too and I will die on this hill (Spock is half human, so I am not counting him). Tuvok seemed to me like he found humans (and Neelix) to be illogical, difficult to understand, and somewhat annoying; but nonetheless he couldn't help but like them as well, though he wouldn't admit that to them (tangential hot take: Vulcans claim to suppress their emotions, but they still make decisions based on emotion and rationalise them as being based on logic after the fact)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Overall I like Tuvok as a character. My problem with Tuvok is they write him as if Vulcans have no emotion. He even says that.

Vulcans are supposed to have such strong emotions they need to constantly keep them under control and use logic to make decisions because the emotions cause them to make bad decisions.

I think that's a lot more interesting for a character. Nemoy said he played Spock as a guy who was constantly in wonder at things and keeping it under control.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 49 minutes ago* (last edited 48 minutes ago)

With few exceptions, they're also supposed to also have mastered their emotions very handily. Partly fue to exceptional biology. Not absolutely constantly be on the verge of breaking into tears or a rage, a la Enterprise.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago

Tuvok is black!?!?! I thought he was a Vulcan! I suppose the next thing you are going to tell me is that Odo isn't a Shapeshifter?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 hours ago

A gay interspecies couple?

Rick Berman:

[–] [email protected] 48 points 10 hours ago (6 children)

You hated Discovery because it was too woke.

I hated Discovery because it wasn’t woke enough.

We are not the same.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Picard: “We work to better ourselves and the rest of humanity”

Tilly: “I went to Elon Musk junior high school”

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yea, Discovery is the best case for virtue signaling being a real thing, which is unfortunate because Trek's literal entire thing is coming off as "common sense" while spreading a progressive message through allegory.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 39 minutes ago* (last edited 20 minutes ago) (1 children)

I have to say, I tried really hard but holy crap was the "in your face-ness" of it a problem for me and one of like 5 reasons I can't stand it.

It's definitely not any of the concepts, etc. Good to see diverse, women-strong, etc casts and plots. But a lot of it was written A) incredibly poorly, like to try to appeal to middle schoolers, B) it couldn't stop telling us REALLY LOUD and artificially how progressive it was, and it was jarring and annoying.

Edit: and I'd argue they dropped nearly all of the progressive parts of, say TNG. Or, like, where adults acted like grownups.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 25 minutes ago

it couldn’t stop telling us REALLY LOUD and artificially how progressive it was, and it was jarring and annoying.

Do you have any examples of this?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, really. There wasn't much enlightened future stuff going on and they pointlessly killed (and then returned, but still) one of the gay guys for shock value(?). It's just so poorly written that neither that nor any of the empowerment messages landed for me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah.. exactly. Although after all that I only fully gave up on the show when they jumped forward in time to a depressing future in which the Federation had dissolved. Like, way to completely and utterly miss the point of the setting. I’m gonna go cry into my earl grey now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 26 minutes ago

I was totally on board with that premise, thinking they might basically do their version of Andromeda mixed with late-season Enterprise. But then the actual plot happened.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I was more annoyed at the klingon subtitle style/font being difficult to read quickly. Each one talking like a kid who just shoved a whole pack of Big League Chew in their mouth from all the prosthetics also bothered me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Each one talking like a kid who just shoved a whole pack of Big League Chew in their mouth from all the prosthetics also bothered me.

Even worse than how bad the Ferengi were with that

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 minutes ago

You know, you just reminded me of the episode of Enterprise where the Ferrengi took over the ship. And I was surprised how much I enjoyed (most of) it, and thought the first act where they didn't bother giving the Ferrengi subtitlea, everything was communicated without the benefit of dialog.

I'm sure everyone else hated it, especially because of some of the weak plot points and how there wasn't supposed to be any contact with the Ferrengi for 200 years and because everyone hates Enterprise.

On the other hand, it had Jeffrey Combs.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 9 hours ago

I hated it because half of the characters annoyed me and the other half didn’t have enough screen time

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

My only major critiques for Discovery are that they walked back a Calvin-verse reboot after fan backlash (my interpretation), and that the theatrics usually don't mesh well with the action-oriented flow of the rest of the episodes around it.

The reboot thing was, to me, overly clear with the changes in aesthetics and technology. Especially the Klingons. And I get it: it's hard to dazzle audiences through vibrant creative direction, with decades of canon on your back. All that older stuff has compromises from old effects tech and budget baked in, so breaking from it is incredibly tempting. But the fans will not let you do this: just ask the Dr. Who production people. So we get some really oddball stuff happening in the first few seasons.

To the latter point, we get moments like: "The ship is going to explode in one minute, so let's argue for at least ten before we deal with that." This kind of thing happens a lot in Discovery and a binge-watch would have you thinking that the ship's counselor is either dead or contemplating transporter suicide. The dissent between characters feels valid most of the time, but other times is just jarringly out of character or contrary to self-preservation as to break suspension of disbelief. But there's usually angry, loud, arguing dissent. Which is a shame since these same episodes is hitting the mark on every other metric, IMO.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 hours ago

My response to the first five episodes was very much "It's like the writers are justifying a councilor being on the bridge crew."

[–] [email protected] 82 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (9 children)

Pretty sure the downvoters didn't finish reading that...

[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (7 children)

I find many of these shows and movies that are accused of being woke is because they create protagonists without flaws, out of fear of making non traditional characters look bad I guess? But protagonists without flaws are boring.

I'm trying to think what Burnham's fatal flaw is, or her deadly sin. It's mostly stuff that has happened to her and she has to overcome but that's not the same thing. Interesting protagonist have flaws like hubris, vice, hypocrisy, greed, something that makes them more real. You look at characters like Rey from star wars and again, flawless except for her past, which again is something that happened to her not something she is.

That's why people didn't like when Han Solo didn't shoot first. Yes Han Solo is overall a good guy, but he's also ruthless and a gangster when we meet him. If he's already a flawless good guy at the start,that just sucks. Anakin as well, good but arrogant and controlling

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 hours ago (17 children)

was there even one gay character in TNG?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 hours ago

Riker is clearly pan

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

No, but as soon as they add C to LGBT, Beverly will identify as part of the queer community.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Candlesexual?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 hours ago

… Cannabissexual?

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›