A second department, no less, to improve efficiency in the government.
The GAO exists.
Are two efficiency offices more efficient than one?
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
A second department, no less, to improve efficiency in the government.
The GAO exists.
Are two efficiency offices more efficient than one?
25% x 25% is like... 609% more or some shit. Math is wild. Numbers can get really big
/S sort of
I guess they think that competition produces the most efficient outcome, like they do with private enterprise.
"Daunting?" Nah. They'll have fun playing pretend while they use their non-existent authority to try to bully others to let them further enrich themselves.Their success won't be measured in efficiency, but in lulz.
So there has to be a new department - headed by TWO different people that's going to be dealing with efficiency in the government?
This has to be the dumbest timeline
Why does the media just gobble this up? It takes an act of Congress to make a new department. DOGE is bullshit.