this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
74 points (96.2% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3482 readers
23 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Source

Not visible in the map, but interesting to note, is that in France the trains normally drive on the left, except in Alsace where they drive on the right as a legacy of the time the province belonged to Germany.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Train noob here, what does the "20% of multi-track operation" line mean?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

An affordance to allow this maneuver:

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Multi-track meaning two “lanes” of track laid side by side to allow for bi-directional operation.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

soooo does the difference between x-handed and x-handed 20% multi-track mean that the x-handed colouring has >80% single lane tracks?

i live in australia (left-handed), and… that seems… implausible

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That seems to be the insinuation.

Based on what I know, lengths of track with a single line of rail typically have periodic sections with sidetracks to allow trains to “pull over” and let an oncoming (usually the faster) train pass them before returning to the main track.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hmmm I mean I guess we’re a very big country for our population so maybe the mining and interstate rail overwhelm the metro and Sydney-Melbourne networks… I’m just surprised it’s by more than 80%

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

If you go by length instead of ridership it seems extremely plausible. Australia is a big place and building 2 lanes for mostly freight trains is an unnecessary expense.

Sidings/loops/passing tracks, allow trains to pass on a single track, and since things can be more regular scheduled (ideally anyway) with trains, they can work well enough and with much less track building needed.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

All of our trains in Lebanon have been ripped out in the 60s and 70s so we can siphon our money more efficiently to the patron class by buying cars and gas through their companies. Granted cars make sense for the topography but trains should have stayed in operation, especially for freight.

Not sure how recent some of these data points are, unless it just describes the law for some of these if less data is available

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

The terminology of this map confuses me quite a bit. Austria has mostly right-hand traffic nowadays, the Franz-Josefs-Bahn being the only exception I am aware of; it used to be a lot more mixed until the early-to-mid-2010s.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Are the legend markers not ordered? Or is ‘Left-hand traffic with exceptions’ really more ‘left-hand’ than ‘Left-hand traffic’?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I think it is less. And more than 20% share is more. As in, we do left handed, and we also have a significant portion of our network that is multi track and therefore abides by that convention. As opposed to somewhere that is just left handed, but doesn't have a mature/extensive use of that convention because their network is smaller/sparser

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"Welcome to France. Be prepared to change trains regularly."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I thought all trains were only from and to Paris, so you’d have to change trains at most once, whether you’re going from Marseille to Toulon or from Caen to Le Havre.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Paris has more than one terminus.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

That sounds highly inefficient.