this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
179 points (98.4% liked)

Games

16690 readers
892 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 102 points 1 year ago (2 children)

i feel like every military needs to go through their personnel and fire every war thunder player on principle at this point. like come on.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My pet theory is that the military uses the war thunder forums as a honeypot to catch leakers.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Isn't that the general theory?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Security clearance red flag

[–] [email protected] 96 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

Every damn week...

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I like when it's to win an argument. But it seems it wasn't the case here?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And the game is far from a simulator. That's what I don't get. Like if it was steel beasts or arma or dcs it'd make sense to me.

But war of duty. I just don't get

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They can't keep doing this!

How hard is it to not leak sensitive military documents??

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

Being right on the Internet > OPSEC and NATSEC secrets

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Well, I just checked, the US military has over one million active personnel, and if 1% of them are dumb, and 1% of that are especially dumb, that's still over a hundred people. So if a few of them play War Thunder... yup.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Well, I would assume "Not Very".

But, you know, people are thick...

...very thick.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is getting outrageous. Do you think they'll hit a 15 streak before playing War Thunder is court marshallable?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is War Thunder even a good game? The only time I hear about it is after these leaks. Then it's like viral marketing and I think "this game must be awesome if people are committing crimes to get minor Stat changes" then I forget about it for a few months until the next leak.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It is a free pay-to-win shooter. It is designed to get certain types of people addicted to it, to most other people it is boring as hell.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

The UCMJ will take care of them.

What an idiot.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I think this makes it leak #18 from the forums

Turns out baiting nerds into internet arguments is significantly more effective then foreign op agents infiltrating the dod.