this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
550 points (99.5% liked)

politics

19096 readers
4313 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Since Donald Trump’s election win, sales of dystopian and politically themed books have surged, with titles like The Handmaid’s Tale and 1984 climbing the U.S. bestseller lists.

Feminist and anti-tyranny works, such as Men Explain Things to Me by Rebecca Solnit and On Democracy by Timothy Snyder, have also seen significant spikes, reflecting public concerns over women’s rights and democratic values.

Women’s rights groups and individuals have voiced alarm over potential threats to reproductive rights, recalling Trump’s support for the Roe v. Wade overturn during his previous term.

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 118 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual!!!

[–] [email protected] 66 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You mean we shouldn't build the torment Nexus from the best selling dystopian book Don't build the torment Nexus?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago

Big tech: "Don't be ridiculous! Think of the shareholder dividends!"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Fascists by definition don't get the joke (or point)

[–] [email protected] 69 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Can confirm. My wife insisted we watch this last night.

*Watch the series, not just stare at the book.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Real ones ogle volumes with their spouses.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Find someone that will stare at these with you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Me and my partner: 👁️👁️

[–] [email protected] 55 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Everyone is just trying to map out the road ahead of us now

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 days ago (1 children)

At least they're trying. Education is power.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Oh believe me, I've switched my reading habits, too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I have been reading a lot more since the 2016 result. It wasn't the only reason, but it was a major one (especially non-fiction).

[–] [email protected] 37 points 6 days ago

Atwood is also one of the sanest centrist voices I've ever read, in essays and interviews. (Centrist by Canadian standards -- probably quite left by US standards). She always seems to be acutely aware of institutional inertia and how things like independent courts are vital to free societies. Wish there were more like her.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 days ago

People are buying these books while they’re still allowed to.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 days ago

I'm just glad she's safe in Canada.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 days ago

You may also want to add Stefan Zweig’s “The World of Yesterday” to this list. Zweig was a Viennese Jew who escaped* the Nazis, and wrote poignantly about the world he has loved that was lost to Hitler. Today’s Zweigs would write about the mundane, taken-for-granted world before 2017.

* he and his wife managed to make it to Argentina, but then, a year or so before the end of the war, committed suicide. Being safe from physical harm doesn’t necessarily mean you’ve escaped.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago

Fuck, if only the road was clear BEFORE the election..

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Check out The Parable of the Sower

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

The fact that this book starts in 2024 with an election gone wrong is too spot on.

Great read that goes into climate and class issues as well.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago

They should have read it before the election to learn what the Trump Movement is aiming at. Well, at least they will now learn what to expect.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

They want to read the book so they'll understand the live action play when it happens in real life.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

At least if people wear those handmaid hats to the protests that should help skirt the facial recognition systems.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

That’s a really solid point, but they make it difficult to have proper situational awareness, so use cautiously.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

Under His eye.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Great timing.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Shit. I read it years ago and can't even remember what it was about.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Some chick. I think she was a handmaid.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago (2 children)

No, I mean read it ten years ago and the message was lost on me because it was just dystopian scifi. I was also ten years more ignorant.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Then read it again? Or watch the series, it's very well done.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Watch the series on Hulu. Good interpretation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

And damn did she have tail.