this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
550 points (95.7% liked)

US Authoritarianism

789 readers
727 users here now

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: [email protected]

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The props are worded so insanely that without hours of prep, I would vote incorrectly.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 19 hours ago

My state banned ranked choice voting by an insane margin because it was worded like "only citizens should be allowed to vote, and each citizen only gets one vote each!" Literally two Google searches would clear it up if people had more critical thinking skills

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

In character for the US. Now it just has to play a Civil War movie and some patriotic montage to act like it isn't there.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In California they have prisoners fight the wildfires. I find it sickening, but it's a popular program. I wonder if that's where this result comes from. The wildfires get worse and worse and they need bodies to sacrifice. Depressing.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (5 children)

That's a volunteer program. This is inside the prison work and comes with physical and mental punishment if you refuse.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (4 children)

My thoughts as well.

It's the wildfires. They don't want to pay more in taxes to hire more firefighters, at least that's what makes sense to me.

It's still an abominably shitty thing and, IMHO, a human rights violation too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

They don't want to pay more in taxes to hire more firefighters, at least that's what makes sense to me.

california is like richer than most countries in the world. dnc and its upper class base is more rotten that i had thought. no wonder 15 million democrats don’t want to vote for these cronies.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

A "resistance" against the will of the majority is generally called a terrorist organization.

Progressive Americans, face it: Most of the people around you want this.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

George Carlin called it decades ago.

The politicians are a reflection of us.

Our PEOPLE suck.

A fat, greedy, proudly ignorant, proudly racist, spray tanned elitist bully drunk on schaudenfreude is the perfect American mascot.

He's like the United States took human form. A monument to all our sins.

If you still consider the rugged individualism we crow about a feature and not severe mental illness, you are infected with the disease. If you want winners and losers, go live in the forest and see if you live or die.

Societies need to work together, and we have been trained in the spirt of capitalist competition🤮 to compete against eachother, to tear eachother down, to root against one another hoping to get moooaaaar for ourselves. This is the very opposite of a society.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

The first part is not true. The White rose and the french resistance in ww2 are both called "resistance". So the distinction between terrorists and resistance is in the eye of the historian.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

It hasn't been called yet but I certainly didn't have California votes to be a slave state on my 2024 bingo card.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Call for resistance? You can get enough Americans to get off their arse to vote every four years?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

You can't get most Americans to stop playing Fortnight or watching Dancing with the stupid Stars to even pay attention to the country

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Looks like people voted no to slavery, but the question asked do you not support slavery.

The answer should have been (yes) I do not support slavery.

Instead (no) I do not support slavery.

I can image a good chunk of people got confused with the wording, and I myself am still confused reading it.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Are you sure? It seems pretty straightforward to me. “This amendment would bar slavery and involuntary servitude.” It’s the first sentence.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is the ballot text, it's not really confusing at all.

Link

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The link you supplied clears it all up. No way anyone could have misunderstood the vote, the ballot even outlines what yes and no mean in the context.

I think I now agree with what krashmo said in the thread below.

"Or maybe Americans are largely shitty people. Stop trying to excuse the behavior and accept it for what it is"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The part that was most surprising to me was this:

ARGUMENTS

PRO Proposition 6 ends slavery in California and upholds human rights and dignity for everyone. It replaces carceral involuntary servitude with voluntary work programs, has bipartisan support, and aligns with national efforts to reform the 13th Amendment. It will prioritize rehabilitation, lower recidivism, and improve public safety, resulting in taxpayer savings.

CON No argument against Proposition 6 was submitted.

No one came out in opposition? Not even the bureau of prisons, or the warden's union‽‽ And it still didn't pass?

Edit: I, and all my housemates claim to have, voted for this proposition, and actually all the propositions I had on my ballot in IB to pass. It's truly disheartening to see that all the other props that mattered less than this one passed, and this one that literally seems to have no downsides is potentially failing.

For reference, the downsides of almost every single other proposition on the IB ballot would increase various taxes, and all of them passed. WTELF you stupid NIMBYS‽‽‽

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nobody wants to admit they support slavery but clearly >50% do

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago

Your wording is more confusing to me

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago

This is the first result I checked for when I woke up this morning, and I nearly vomited when I saw the breakdown. Half the vote is still uncounted, but I don’t think the result will change. I’m ashamed of my neighbors.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be fair, and that’s being very fair, it does end with “allowing involuntary servitude as a punishment for crime” and a case could be made for confusing wording.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (5 children)

This is the ballot text, it's not really confusing at all.

Link

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Oh wow, that’s actually explained very well. Fair enough, y’all just want slavery I guess lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I think it's really just an obvious proof of the complete and total lack of reading comprehension that most citizens have here.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I especially enjoy it losing with literally no opponents and no arguments against.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›