General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
The party said ministers would be forced to open their books to the forecasters, though any government wanting to disregard them could seek to reverse the legislation.
Still though, a step in the right direction. Not that it's hard to have stronger watchdogs than the Tory party. However I'd be more interested when we get back to the pre-2010 level of checks and balances against the government, because that was the first thing the Tories cut when they introduced austerity.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Ministers would be legally bound to consult their official watchdog on major tax and spending changes under Labour plans to prevent a recurrence of Liz Truss’s ill-fated mini-budget.
The Labour leader, Keir Starmer, pledged on Friday to introduce legislation to ensure that the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has the power to independently publish its own impact assessment.
Labour announced the plan, if it wins a general election, before the first anniversary of Truss and her chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng’s £45bn spree of unfunded tax cuts.
Labour has promised to amend the rules so the OBR would be able to publish independently the impact of any major fiscal event making permanent tax and spending changes.
Boris Johnson also considered not going to the OBR before the first budget of his premiership, but this was rejected by his then-chancellor, Sajid Javid, according to a book by the Telegraph’s political editor, Ben Riley-Smith.
The party also said it would set out a fixed timetable for annual autumn budgets, followed by a spring update in early March, to give families and businesses time to prepare for changes.
The original article contains 377 words, the summary contains 183 words. Saved 51%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!