this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
286 points (96.4% liked)

News

23608 readers
3580 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Biden administration announced a major initiative to protect Americans from medical debt on Thursday, outlining plans to develop federal rules barring unpaid medical bills from affecting patients' credit scores.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a failure of society that medical debt exists in the first place.

[–] danhab99@programming.dev -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ban insurance. Force the hospitals to compete like civilized businesses.

[–] Krzak@discuss.online 7 points 1 year ago

Hospitals are meant to save lives, not be profitable

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I'd prefer a focus on eliminating the for-profit health care system, or the credit score system. Adding more band-aids to an infected wound is a bad idea.

[–] TheTetrapod@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Honestly, if we're going to have credit, as a society, then credit scores aren't a terrible solution. Otherwise it's just you pleading your case to whatever bank employee you happen to be sitting in front of. In the past, that system hasn't gone well for certain groups that tend to face discrimination.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago

I get that, but it's a bit of a red herring. Credit scores ultimately exist to mitigate risk for bankers, and the idea that it equalizes results for the population is secondary. Bankers should be taking on risks with loans, because that's what the return is based on. If we remove the risk for bankers, but they still make interest, the system is broken.

[–] subcytoplasm@l.tta.wtf 4 points 1 year ago

It is worth noting that credit scores don't necessarily eliminate bias, it just adds another step. It wouldn't surprise me to learn if you could predict an individual's credit score based on non-financial facts because some of the old biases were cooked into the system (by proxy or not). (I very much suspect this is true but don't have it in me to go hunt down papers right this instant...)

An improvement over arguing your case with the teller, yes, but not necessarily flawless.

[–] outrageousmatter@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For-profit health care system should honestly just eliminated even if it takes millions of job away, it should have never existed. Then fixing a problem with the credit system, where paying off all your credit drop your credit scores. It should increase for that as it tells the bank "Look this person paid it off, and is stable." Instead of "Paid it off, shame on you, we didn't make any money from it."

[–] Vent@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do we replace credit scores with? How should banks determine who can be trusted with what loan?

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

It's a good question. Consolidated credit scores like FICO have only existed for the last 40 years or so.

I don't have a good answer at the moment, but I'll also say that making sure that bankers are comfortable to the nth degree has not done the well for the average person in the US. Perhaps they could simply take on the risk.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a millennial, you think I give a fuck about my credit score? Thanks I guess lol

[–] protist@mander.xyz 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are plenty of us who do care, and I think protecting people's credit scores from catastrophic medical debt is a fantastic idea

[–] Godnroc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is true, but also with interest rates so high and home prices defying logic does it really even matter?

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For everything else that people do with credit scores? Uh yeah. Buying a car, having a credit card, getting any loan, renting an apartment, your credit score is used for a LOT more than just buying a house.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

There are lots of jobs that run a credit check too

[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

Fuck credit scores in general, they shouldn't exist.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think it’s generally a good idea, but could that incentivize people to just not pay their medical debt, and if so, what ramifications does that have?

If I’m saddled with a $100,000 medical bill that won’t impact my credit score no matter how long I put it off for, wouldn’t I just want to put it off for as long as possible (ie never pay it ever)?

If that happens, what do doctors/hospitals do if they never get paid? Does the cost of medical care go up for everybody, or could it eventually force them to start lobbying for single-payer, so that they’ll get paid something rather than nothing? Or do hospitals start restricting who can pay or do they start making you put up collateral before they’ll perform surgeries? So they’ll take your house if you don’t pay up?

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Who cares? Healthcare should be free anyway.

But I'll bite. With as much as hospitals gouge you on every single thing, they can afford to have some of their patients not pay. No doctor is going to starve cause you won't pay your medical debt.

[–] iconic_admin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I doubt it.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

Different take: how about we outlaw credit scores and creating dossiers by companies?

[–] sudo22@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So if an unpaid debt can't affect your credit score, can you essentially just ignore it without significant impact to your life? Like the only recourse the hospital would have is to sue you I assume?

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

They write it off and sell it to a collection agency already.

Once it’s in collections the hospital doesn’t care and will no longer see it even if you pay the debt collector.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You know what would be even better? Not allowing medical debt in the first place.

[–] silverbax@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We really need a bot to chime in whenever someone shows up with Infinite Leftist arguments.

There are Policy Leftists and Infinite Leftists.

[–] johnsdani@discuss.online 1 points 1 month ago

This is great news! The new initiative to protect Americans from the negative impacts of medical debt on credit scores is a big step forward in financial healthcare reform. It's reassuring to see measures being taken to ensure that unexpected medical bills don't have long-term negative effects on personal finance. Just as we rely on secure payments to safeguard our financial transactions, this policy could safeguard our financial future by preventing medical debt from undermining our credit health.

Suckers, now im gonna get those bionic arms.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok? We could just pass single payer healthcare instead and that would have accomplished the same thing and more.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 0 points 1 year ago

There are too many Republicans in the legislature to make that happen. Give Democrats a sizeable majority, enough to make Manchin and Sinema's votes to not count, and sure. Until then, this is great

[–] Lexam@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Lmao! Too late! A bankruptcy and foreclosure too late!