A united England could only take a divided Scotland by marrying into it.
The outcome is clear, Scotland sweeps then started fighting itself.
this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
36 points (100.0% liked)
okmatewanker
583 readers
125 users here now
No foul language - i.e. French ๐คฎ
Obviously satire, dozy wankers
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Boy those Scots sure a contentious bunch.
those Scots sure a contentious bunch.
You just made an enemy for life!
Northern Ireland doesn't get its own zone because the outcome would be too obvious otherwise.
They'd kill each other at the first chance.
If there's booze involved, then definitely 13.
If there's no booze allowed... 13.
Didn't the English already try this and yall eventually wound up with the UK?
That was largely done with good old bribing people to be on your side, its also how we got the British empire as it basically started with paying various groups in India to fight eachother which is what allowed the British to conquer a nation that was far wealthier and more powerful at the time.
10 has Liverpool, Manchester and Leeds. I reckon the only real challenge would be 13 but combining forces they could take Glasgow and then pick of any lone Highland madman.
10 has a huge numerical advantage over Glasgow, and we could counter their casuals with Mancunian spiceheads. The scousers could be a liability or an asset, but then someone has to stand at the front and get mown down by the initial Highland berzerker charge.
If the women from 13 get involved, 13.
They will be using readily available objects as weapons however.
Then they'd be disqualified, as it's "no weapons".
- NORN IRON. Wind your necks in the rest of ya