this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
257 points (98.1% liked)

News

23284 readers
3647 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A French judge has reversed a ruling in the trial of a man who is accused of drugging his wife to sleep and recruiting dozens of men to abuse her for over a decade.

Lawyers for Gisèle Pelicot, 72, had earlier appealed against the judge's initial decision to only show video of the crimes to lawyers and the jury. 

She has waived her right to anonymity in the trial, enabling the shocking details of the case to be heard in public.

Her lawyers argued the video should be seen to draw attention to the use of drugs to commit sexual abuse. They hailed the latest ruling as a "victory"

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 170 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Man this lady is brave as fuck

[–] [email protected] 104 points 1 month ago

"If these same hearings, through their publicity, help prevent other women from having to go through this, then she will find meaning in her suffering," one of Ms Pelicot's lawyers, Stéphane Babonneau, said.

What a badass. I have so much respect for the ways she’s been handling this. A real “fuck you” to her abusers. Repeatedly.

[–] [email protected] 100 points 1 month ago (2 children)

As long as that's Giséle's choice, that's a huge win and I wish her luck with her case. Thats beyond horrifying

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah, she waived her right to anonymity, not automatically. She chose to, and it's her lawyers arguing these videos should be seen by the world. She is willing to give up her privacy like that to show exactly what these monsters will do to defenseless people. Absolute badass.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I respect her right to do this, but I'm not sure what it gains anyone. If anyone, I imagine people will view it for their own gratification.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Then we should also make clear that anybody who watches them for gratification is a truly evil piece of shit.

Many people delude themselves into thinking they're good people even when they're evil, we shouldn't let them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Gains the same thing Emmett Till's open casket gained.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't think I'd watch them out of respect, that's horrifying.

But man, I support the hell out of her throwing this evidence at her attackers full force and women should take strength out of her example.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I truly hope it makes it damn near impossible for any one of these men too get a job ever again.

Imagine if you both have a conviction of rape, and a video of you doing it on public record?

Christ.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Between this and Diddy, hard to believe how far some people take it. No different than serial killers imo.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Be honest: it's really really different magnitude.

Rape (especially such) is unbelievably horrible.
But death - it's the final point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Me and a friend had an ongoing debate whether rape or murder was worse. I argued that murder was worse than rape while he argued the opposite. It was mostly just the two of us being edgelords. But after reading about these two cases, I started to think that the serial rapists might be more depraved.