[-] [email protected] 3 points 58 minutes ago

You want KVM.

But I'd check the performance on the NAS first. They're not really built for VMs so you might be missing hardware features, but I'd check resource usage to see if you're maxing anything out. And try reducing resolution, color depth, etc. to make it easier.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

1832, though "John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it" is apocryphal.

Also that was Andrew Jackson being a racist so maybe not the best role model.

I'm not aware of SCOTUS directing federal marshals to enforce their decisions. That may not ever have been tried.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

Just having them there on detail probably costs more than they recover from fare evaders.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

For science and engineering, workstation cards like the A6000 aren't going anywhere.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

Look man, I get what you're doing, but it's just getting old at this point.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

I've used Lawnchair for years and had no issues either. Is there some widespread problem I've been lucky enough to avoid?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

Usually people are against just throwing more hardware at a problem.

They're going to keep making more powerful hardware either way, since parallel processing capability supports graphics and AI just fine. But if they can use a novel software solution to drastically increase performance, why not?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

It's just another graphics-enhancing tool. But instead of fixed-algorithm antialiasing, it's machine-learning-powered "fill in the blank".

I don't think this application is really all that controversial. Some people are unhappy that AAA games are going to expect or require compatible hardware in the future for no good reason, if the game itself runs just fine without it.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

It's also an excellent way to get your recommended daily value of microplastics.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 3 hours ago

tl;dr: still up in the air, but expect more extreme swings, hooray climate change

[-] [email protected] 16 points 3 hours ago

I don't think he's capable of feeling shame.

[-] [email protected] 35 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Headline is misleading. They're not destroying playgrounds, they're ripping up pavement and planting trees.

Personally I've never seen a paved playground. Mine usually had sand or woodchips.

29
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Link to post: https://lemmy.world/post/19274834

If you tap that link in Boost it'll probably crash, so don't do it unless you're okay with that.

I'm guessing the problem is that the post URL is a magnet link.

Edit: oh yeah, to work around, you'll have to open it in a browser and hide it.

39
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I got banned earlier today with the message "rule 1", no other information about why, or which comment broke the rule. As far as I can tell it was this one, which just says "We want the bot gone. That’s it. It’s really that simple."

So I checked the modlog for other bans, and @[email protected] was banned today as well, also just for "rule 1", probably either for the comment saying "a stupid bot writing useless bullshit" or "This is what you call "Not listening to criticism."", neither of which are an attack on any person.

(Also earlier today @[email protected] was banned with the message "fuck off", which I'm pretty sure is not a reason to ban someone from a major community, but doesn't appear to be related to the MBFC bot.)

One more today, @[email protected] was banned, again just "rule 1", last comment being this one, again not an attack on any person.

So what's the deal here? I couldn't find any rules for mods on lemmy.world with a brief poke around, but are we letting mods run major communities like little fiefdoms, banning people for criticism?

4
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: next ›

catloaf

joined 7 months ago