295
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Apple users bash new iPhone 15: ‘Innovation died with Steve Jobs’::Smart phone fans are griping about Apple's new devices since the arguably anti-climactic announcement of the forthcoming iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus on Tuesday.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 124 points 1 year ago

Steve Jobs didn't innovate a thing in his life. Apple has always been stealing tech and pretending that they created it.

Now with this new version, they don't even have much anything to steal. At best, they pretended that the EU didn't force them to adopt USB 3 and boast how much faster it is than Lightning port.

[-] [email protected] 81 points 1 year ago

Actually the EU only forced them to adopt USB C. Only their 'Pro' model actually has USB 3. Imagine having to pay a premium for the luxury of a 15 year old technology

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And they still don't have PD on the pro.

My guess is that they'll be going portless soon, and don't want users freaking out that they can't change their phones as quickly, so they're intentionally nerfing the charge speeds on USB C.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago

Did Jobs build teams that invented the GUI, the cellphone, multitouch gestures, or mobile web browsing? No, he didn’t. But he built teams that productized those things better than anyone else before them, and that team forever changed our expectations for computing.

To be an innovative composer you don’t have to invent new instruments, scales, time signatures, etc. You have to know how to arrange existing stuff in new ways.

[-] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago

Yep, I am not a Jobs fan boy at all but he definitely had a clear goal and required people to get the product right before shipping it, to the extent to which that was possible for the tech at the time.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Yeah because the first iPhone wasn’t a Revolution,

load more comments (27 replies)
load more comments (36 replies)
[-] [email protected] 72 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Eh. I mean, are there any great innovations left when it comes to smartphones? They kinda all just look and do the same nowadays.

They sure made USB3 look like a breakthrough innovation, though...

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

Functioning AI voice assist, foldable, better peripherals, better input systems, better data transfer between systems, more durable, better battery life, repairable, more sustainable, better UI, decentralised communication options, meshnet options, etc.

There's plenty to do about smartphones that needs innovating...

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

are there any great innovations left

Honestly, this is such a weird take because, yes. Of course there are innovations left, you just cannot think of them yourself now because then they obviously would not be innovative but rather same old same old. Now the rate of new innovations probably did slow down a lot, I agree with that, so its harder to find something that is innovative in this space.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Of course, they're just being done on Android until Apple takes them on later and markets them as their innovations.

Foldables are already a thing and the next iPhone will likely be their version of it.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago

Y’all are unironically engaging with a NYPost article

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s an insult to call this an article, is regurgitating some shit some dudes on twitter said.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago

I'll admit the hardware on iPhones is excellent but waaayy overkill for iOS.

Let me install my own third party apps w/o the App store (I know altstore exists, but needing to renew apps every few days is super janky). If I spend my money on a device, I should be allowed to put whatever I want on it, however I want. Let me, the consumer accept the risks of doing so.

Let me use HDMI out over USB-C to an external monitor and have a full desktop with ability to run desktop class apps. Let me use the full potential of the chipsets to get actual work done and effectively replace a computer.

Till then, Android it is for me because I can do both these things easily. I know my use cases are more niche, but "Pro" naming on consumer Apple products is just fluff.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

Let me install my own third party apps w/o the App store (I know altstore exists, but needing to renew apps every few days is super janky). If I spend my money on a device, I should be allowed to put whatever I want on it, however I want. Let me, the consumer accept the risks of doing so.

This is THE reason I switched from Apple to Android in 2017 and never looked back.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Unless forced this will never happen on Apple devices. The reason has nothing to do what they claim, about protecting users and people not knowing better. It has everything to do with locking people in their ecosystem. If uncurrated store appears it might bring with it applications that help people migrate out of the Apple ecosystem or provide compatibility with "undesired" devices. Better compatibility with Android watches means lower chances of people buying Apple Watch, etc.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

How would they sell you a mac or a iPad along the iPhone if they open The iPhone that much? We still live in capitalism sir.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago

I don’t know what people are expecting anymore, phones are a mature market. Short of something like foldables (which don’t seem to be catching on) they’re going to be iterative updates. Look at TVs and computers. Years of big advancements and then they’re iterative.

Also the NY Post is an absolutely terrible publication to link to.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago

I only hear: „mimimi, apple does not give me any reason to buy a new phone every year.“ just use your phone 5 years and try a new one then you will feel the difference. Source: I own a iPhone X and my girlfriend owns a iPhone 12 pro

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

It's better for the environment anyway. Regardless of manufacturer. There's also almost no need to get a new device every year. Marginal hardware upgrades mean very little to average consumer, it's just a numbers race and most people don't really take their devices to the edge of performance.

[-] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago

The iPhone is their cash cow. They need it to bring stable and sizeable income to fund things like vr goggles. I’m not saying the haters are wrong, just that their expectations for what Apple will innovate on the iPhone might be a little misplaced.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You don't buy Apple products for the technology or innovations anymore, now you buy Apple products for the bragging rights of being able to pay premium prices for things everyone else has been using for a decade that have a lot more features for a fraction of the price.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

So stop buying them!

1/2 the people complaining about the lack of innovation will turn around and order a new iPhone within the next 12 months or so. Apple doesn't know or care about your snarky comments about them, but they sure as hell know you just gave them many hundreds of dollars for a new phone.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

iPhone users wouldn't piss on the best part of an innovative phone if it was on fire. Who are we kidding?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

Usb-c is going to be a big deal for connecting devices to the phone. Now I don’t need to have some studios lightning adapter to plug in a usb drive or to get video out.

I look forward to experimenting with different things connected to see how they work. I’m curious how video out is handled. But I’m guessing I’ll be disappointed in most cases.

I expect being able to connect a usb drive will be helpful though.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

Usb-c is going to be a big deal for connecting devices to the phone.

Android users welcome you to 2017...

Now I don’t need to have some studios lightning adapter to plug in a usb drive or to get video out.

...or not. Apple will limit USB-C to USB 2.0 speeds so... good luck with that.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

corporate wants to know the difference between these two phone versions

"its the same phone"

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

“We put a bigger number on the box.”

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

We also changed the 14 to a 15

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

No matter what the subject, the NY Post is not even good for toilet paper.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Ngl they kinda are right. The last time I saw a feature that made me consider them was maybe like 4-6 years ago. I still bloody love Ipods tho.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Did you forget about the groundbreaking feature of the removal of the audio jack?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

That’s probably true for most phones. There’s only so much you can do with the black obelisk they’ve all become and now we’re just quibbling over what external connections they have. I mean you could tweak the camera, put in a better battery, better processor…but the obelisk phone is done as far as what can be “innovated”.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I would like to give apple credit for not rebranding USB Type-C and claiming they invented it.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Didn't they actually participate in it's invention...?

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I was watching the announcement yesterday and afterwards I was trying to recollect what cool new feature there was, I had to rewatch it because I fell asleep, but even then I couldn't find anything. They should thank the EU that they at least can talk about the difference between USB2 and USB3 speeds.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

The only thing apple can really do to push the platform forward is to allow people to dock their phone and use it as a desktop.

But they are not doing this because it will hurt their laptop and desktop sales.

They also don’t want to let people sideload. They know that people will not want to use a washed down desktop version because people don’t like using the washed down iPadOS desktop version.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
295 points (83.9% liked)

Technology

58073 readers
3364 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS