this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
197 points (95.8% liked)

politics

19104 readers
3716 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Representative Rashida Tlaib, the only Palestinian American member of Congress, was attacked Monday for supposedly claiming that Michigan’s attorney general is going after pro-Palestinian protesters solely because she’s Jewish. The only problem is, Tlaib never said anything of the sort.

Jonathan Greenblatt, the CEO of the Anti-Defamation League, posted on X Monday addressing Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer while alleging that Tlaib had made an antisemitic statement about Attorney General Dana Nessel. Nessel is pursuing charges against pro-Palestinian protesters at the University of Michigan, alleging some had assaulted police officers and engaged in ethnic intimidation.


The Jewish Insider article stated that Tlaib “has also claimed that Nessel is only charging the protesters because she’s Jewish.” As evidence, that article repeatedly linked to yet another article, this one from the Detroit MetroTimes—which included no quote from Tlaib referring to Nessel’s Jewishness at all.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just... taking a step back from the politics... all that...

Imagine attempting to explain the bare basics of this to an 8 year old.

The CEO... of the Anti Defamation League ... publicly defamed a Congresswoman.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

To expand a little more: The CEO of a Jewish anti-defamation organization used an antisemitic and pro-Nazi website to defame a Congresswoman.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Jonathan Greenblatt, the CEO of the Anti-Defamation League,

You think anyone with the title "CEO" would have the intelligence to have a lawyer vet a tweet like that before going out. the ADL is going to get wrecked.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Having met a number of CEOs, definitely not. They're dollar store brains and smooth talking metaphor machines. They operate almost completely on intuition and use bullshit to back it up.

I'm sure there are exceptions.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Im close with the CFO of a local company. One of three local companies owned by the same CEO, and the entire accounting department stopped trying to tell him all his ideas are straight up just illegal or tax fraud and instead silently fix everything in the background and deal with him after the numbers stop being a threat to their existence outside of jail. People like Trump are not the exception to CEOs they're the rule.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The adl has more power than most senators, best case scenario is the story gets disappeared like all negative stories on the adl.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I doubt it since this is a pretty clear cut defamation lawsuit.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Most likely they’ll settle out of court. Payday for Tlaib, a retraction, and there may or may not be an NDA causing it to drop out of the media.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't think that. I think it means they're probably a nepobaby.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If I ever have kids, one of the first pieces of wisdom I’m sharing is “get a lawyer. Best you can afford.”

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Oh boy. She's gonna clean out some bank accounts lmao.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Has any news of her suing come out yet?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I hope she sues.