Satan 2? What is this high school missile competition?
Almost. It's NATO propaganda.
I'm always curious about anti-NATO people. What is it about NATO that you don't like? I'm not very familiar with exactly what they do, but my understanding is that they are a defensive organization. They wouldn't exist if it weren't for Russia's expansionist goals.
Maybe I'm misinformed. Why the NATO hate?
Calling something that's not good to have delivered to you after a figurative evil being.. yea buddy that sure is some propaganda.
You act as if the actual 'weapon' is designed to re-seed old growth forests and clean aquifers instead of vaporize a sizable chunk of people/buildings.
'Satan 2 missile'
"Ivan, are we the baddies?"
Yes, the people in NATO who make up these propaganda terms are also bad people.
Why are you covering for the fascist government of Russia?
Dude is a fascist cunt, what do you expect?
Nobody would care if NATO hadn't named this thing Satan. Propaganda works.
How many L's is this man giving himself?
I don't think a single soul on this planet was actually afraid of it. In fact, most people theorized this EXACT thing would happen.
That's what happens when you start the war, people who have the capabilities to build it are also the first to get out of the country
is russia testing nuclear arms again?
US tested a Minuteman III missile out of Vandenberg earlier this year. It was not carrying a nuclear payload. It's fairly common for countries to test missiles. Some countries broadcast their intent publicly so as not to accidentally trigger a retaliatory launch. Others don't broadcast publicly, but they do communicate via the good-old-boy net for the same reason.
This may be off topic, but I absolutely loved reading about Minuteman III guidance system.
And unlike all those "missiles by subscription and good behavior" that many big countries sell to smaller countries, it doesn't rely on any satellite system or external corrections after launch.
BTW, I wonder what's inside Russian ICBMs. People often say that all the Russian big cool projects in defense after breakup of the USSR are just finished Soviet projects. If that is true, there must be an awfully complex, but geek-porn-ish thing inside, possibly with analog and maybe even mechanical elements. If that is not, it's still interesting. Right now yes, Russian military engineering relies on many foreign (NATO countries produced in fact) components. But that didn't become a thing immediately, so I wonder how did they solve problems.
Hey Russia, we're launching a nuke missle with the nuke removed in your direction. Just testing we swear!
Sort of. The ICBM rocket delivery system.
The US is developing a new ICBM as well.
ok so they're not "testing nuclear payloads" then. That's good to know. I was confused as to what they meant with the title.
If they ever do test nuclear payloads, thats going to be a nightmare.
The US at least regularly tests its missiles. They shoot from California toward a Pacific island into a painted target.
Modern ICBMs are insanely accurate.
Ya but not with a nuclear nomb just a dummy payload.
Who would have thought that simply robbing an entire nation and giving all the proceeds to your corrupt friends would lead to an inability to manufacture practically everything? TIL
I wonder how China feels having a North Korea on both sides of its country.
Hey, north Korea’s nuclear missiles work
ok slightly unrelated but the satellite pictures have an insane resolution for having been taken from, you know, space
Just imagine what the government has if that's what's available commercially to the public
for one thing, it's mostly just lensing, and for another, it's also partially due to the atmosphere of the earth actually working in tandem with the lensing of the satellites themselves. Dont ask me how it works but from what i understand, seeing out from earth is harder, but seeing in from space is easy. Something to do with the way that light refraction in the atmosphere works or something.
the weirdest thing about telescopes (essentially what these are), is that you can just put a hole in them, and they'll still work just fine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harlan_J._Smith_Telescope#Vandalism_damage
But it passed one, huge success
No one wants to be at the receiving end of the Russian roulette.
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/