154
submitted 10 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

If approved, Measure 118 would institute a 3% tax on most corporations’ total sales in Oregon above $25 million and distribute the money equally among residents of all ages and incomes. The system would go into effect next year.

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

Can we talk about the guy wearing a Yankees hat and a Red Sox shirt in the thumbnail?

[-] [email protected] 18 points 9 hours ago

The real question will be is +3% on everything you purchase greater or less than $1600. If you spend less than $53,000.00 per year it’s a benefit. We know the corporations will simply pass the 3% on to consumers (likely with additional percent or three thrown on for good measure). But if you’re spending less than 50K with those corporations it’s still beneficial.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

That's not how it works - the $1600 is an estimate for what each individual would receive. The total amount collected each year is split evenly between every resident in the state, how much ever it happens to be. So anyone spending less at the taxed companies than the average amount for Oregon will come out ahead. Worth noting that since it targets total sales in Oregon, that tax seemingly applies to corporate-to-corporate sales too, meaning the vast majority of regular people will end up below the average, with a net benefit.

[-] [email protected] 34 points 10 hours ago

I can't imagine who would be opposed to this that isn't brainwashed by corporations.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

I'm largely opposed to it. Because it's (seemingly intentionally) mis-marketed as a corporate tax when it is definitely by any sense of the word a sales tax. Sales taxes on gross receipts are inherently regressive and passed onto those consumers who are dis-proportionally impacted more the lower their income.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 21 minutes ago

The impact in this case benefits lower income people as the proceeds are distributed equally regardless of income level. Though it does feel like it couldve just been an income tax.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 hours ago

they had "death panel" conspiracy theories when they tried to do the affordable care act and the brainwashing was so effective that private insurance still dominates and the affordable care act is likely to die out.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago

The corporations will simply raise prices to make up their deficit. What's stopping them?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Won't the corporations just raise their prices to make up for the tax? Not trying to be a party pooper, but these businesses have entire offices full of people whose job it is to ensure they continuously turn a profit. Every action taken by state and local government is immediately reacted to by the corporate world, and then the state is by its nature slow to respond to the new input.

It's almost like we have let capitalism go wildly out of control.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Even if they do, which they probably will, it still works out as a net positive progressive policy. You can view it like an added 3% sales tax for everyone, including corporations and out-of-state tourists. Everyone gets the exact same rebate on this sales tax at the end of the year - so those who spend the least, the poorest, benefit the most because they paid the least of that tax. Anyone who spends less than the state average (which should be the vast majority of regular people) should see a net benefit. And for those spending above average it'll just be a 3% tax on everything they spend above that statewide average. Kinda just straight-up small scale wealth redistribution.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 hours ago

As far as I know, corporations are generally unable to raise prices enough to make the price difference terrible for the consumer. E.g. invisible prices (taxes) are more effective on a company because companies can’t change their visible prices by much.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 9 hours ago

Yooo this would double my income

[-] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 hours ago

They said what they said

[-] [email protected] 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I misread lol I'm at work but still that's like half my taxes for the month. Also tax the rich

[-] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

It’s probably enough to buy a top hat and a monocle.

this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
154 points (100.0% liked)

Oregon

421 readers
193 users here now

Welcome! Alternative to Oregon Reddit on Lemmy.

Here you can post anything about Oregon State.

Active stats from all instances

/c/[email protected]

Created on July 7th, 2023

Subscribers: 336

User Guide

https://join-lemmy.org/docs/introduction.html

c/Oregon Rules

1. Server Main Rules

The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently.

https://sh.itjust.works/

2. No brigading/ harassment/ usernames, etc.

All usernames and display names must be censored, unless it's a well known public figure.

Do not:

Encourage the brigading or trolling of other communities. Harass/mass ping. Use racist language. Post about getting banned on other communities.

3. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments

Discussion is healthy.

However, spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod's discretion.

4. Post must have Oregon explicitly involved

Post must have Oregon explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about oregon, a city in Oregon, laws, and ext.

5. Educate don’t attack

No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won't be problems.

6. No Advertising

Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service

8. No factually misleading information

Content that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.

8. No Editorialized Headlines

Please try and keep headlines similar to the source articles headlines.

9. No Political Ads or Posts

No political ads of any type are to be posted on r/oregon. Discussion is fine. This includes Oregonians' posts telling people who or what to vote for.

No "vote for" No “vote yes/no”


Other Communities

c/[email protected]

c/[email protected]

c/[email protected]

c/[email protected]

c/[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS