302
submitted 23 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

“Federal Election Commission records show Stein paid $100,000 in July to a consulting outfit that has worked with Republican campaigns, as well as Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s independent presidential bid. The firm, Accelevate, is operated by Trent Pool. The Intercept reported that he appeared to be part of the mob that breached the grounds of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6., 2021. The Journal hasn’t independently verified the reporting.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

If it hasn’t been posted there already, you should post this to [email protected]!

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Done. I looked for that community and missed it the other day. ¯\(ツ)/¯.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 1 hour ago

Neither Harris, nor Trump should be president. I hope they both have heart attacks and we are stuck with their VP's, I'd vote for waltz, he wants to help people. Both Komrad Kamala, a Conman Trumpet, only want to enrich themselves and to do it at the sacrifice of everything you have to give. I will personally never accept a Democrat or Republican in office. The new normal for me is hating both parties so damn much I won't truly rest until they are all on trial for treason, or hanging from the gallows. Nancy and Mitch, you both deserve to dangle in front of a crowd. Short noose and a quick drop. Republic saved.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 46 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Haven’t we all known this about Shill Stein for a very long time, or are we supposed to pretend it’s a big shocking reveal so the leftists can feel better about being duped?

[-] [email protected] 20 points 17 hours ago

The people duped by Stein are not the people who call themselves leftists.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago

On the contrary, many that call themselves leftists have been thoroughly duped. Or they're all bad faith actors, but I try to never attribute to malice that which can be sufficiently explained by incompetence.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (56 replies)
[-] [email protected] 87 points 23 hours ago

And not just republicans. You can find all stripes of accelerationist crazies doing that on this very website.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 14 hours ago

We must bring about glorious revolution, even if our methods aren't particularly effective and millions suffer.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

No you see they have a plan.

  1. Convince people likely to vote for Harris to throw away their votes by voting 3rd party or staying home
  2. Suppress democratic turnout while leaving Republican turnout untouched.
  3. Spoil the election while haughtily going “oh not voting is a vote for trump somehow” and snorting to themselves. Completely blind to context.
  4. Have the things they claim to really super duper care about like genocide in Palestine continue under trump
  5. Also have vulnerable groups in America, like legal Haitian migrants, be the target of Republican vitriol.
  6. (step missing)
  7. Glorious proletariat revolution against the most powerful military and militarized police force to ever exist

Its brilliance is in its simplicity!

[-] [email protected] 57 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

This is the hilarious tragedy of the Democratic party:

If the race is close, then the electoral college, courts and other methods can be used to bump things to the GOP (2000).

If the race isn't that close, then people will feel comfortable voting third party to "make a statement", which can cost enough votes in key states to cost the election (2016).

[-] [email protected] 31 points 21 hours ago

I mean, in 2016 Dems still handily won the popular vote, so it was still the electoral college as the ultimate problem, and third parties were only contributing factors.

In addition to just being a good idea, getting rid of the electoral college would be good because we’d never have to hear about meaningless third-party candidates acting as spoilers. They’d either be real contenders or just narcissists like Jill Stein.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 23 points 21 hours ago

Putin's party supports Putin's hand pick spoiler candidate.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 22 hours ago

No! Come on, everyone! Third party candidates are what's best for the country. We aren't doing this to dilute the vote, we just want to have our voices heard. Sure, everything we are saying is being said by the main two parties, but we also smoke a lot of weed. So, come on, guys, just vote for the Green Party.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 22 hours ago

I vote Green.

Because I live in a country with an actual proportional representation system, so my vote for a minor party still allows the major party that I most closely align with to gain power

[-] [email protected] 19 points 21 hours ago

That has no barring on the Green Party this post is about. They are not the same just because they share a name.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 16 points 22 hours ago

And I couldn't be more happy for you.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
302 points (94.2% liked)

politics

18904 readers
3086 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS