this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
73 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2952 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Governments are weird. Maybe “weird” isn’t the right word. The more accurate word may be “opportunistic.” When it comes to speech they don’t like, they move into this mode. If they think they can silence it, they will try to. And they’ll do this while still pretending the speech they’re trying to control is nothing more than their own.

Dig if you will, my brothers: vanity plates. Government speech or personal speech? Those who view this rationally likely believe that the message on a vanity license plate is the expression of the plate’s purchaser. That it’s delivered by a state-issued plate doesn’t matter. We don’t actually believe the government is trying to send a message with their IMGOD or COPSLIE or LOVETOFU vanity plate. (ALL ACTUAL CASES.)

Instead, we would logically infer the truncated statement on the vanity plate expresses the views of the person paying for this privilege.

But the government also believes it has some obligation to “protect” other drivers from being offended by the personal expressions of others, which is a supremely ridiculous belief to entertain, even professionally. So, the entities issuing plates tend to err on the side of absurdity (governments tend to phrase this as “caution”), rejecting any plate any government plate content moderator might view as “offensive.”

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Unpopular opinion: Vanity plates are stupid and should be done away with completely. It’s government endorsed speech.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

these days i woudn't want a car that stands out or is easily recognizable. so plain plates, white, gray or silver, top-5 selling passenger car, about 4-6 years old, no bumper stickers, no tinting, no mods.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I agree with this. I ride motorcycles and drive cars and I want both to blend in as much as possible. I don't need Karen calling the police and saying "Some jerk was driving too fast, I think his license plate said BUTTSTUFF"

It's the same reason I keep my exhausts quiet. I don't want every person (and cop) within a half mile radius to be alerted every time I use the throttle a little more than I'm supposed to.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I just feel that shiny status cars and special plates are not only tacky but a big red flag towards the moral bankruptcy of the owner.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I had one for a while, kinda fun. But damn they really stick it to you for the yearly renewal cost and I finally dropped it. The ones that always get me are stupid ones that just describe the car. Like "RED BUG" for a red VW beetle...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

My favorite was "WATTGAS"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I saw a Tesla with P0506, which is the diagnostic code for engine RPM lower than expected

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a car that I see occasionally that has a vanity plate that's basically "SPOTTY". It's a car with spots on it. I approve.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I remember seeing a fancy car with a license plate that said NOTAGIFT, which I felt was fair enough.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is it government endorsed speech if I pick what goes on it? My vehicle is not a public building and my plate doesn't represent anyone but me.

That license plate is my property. I keep it. Just because it is official government stamped isn't relevant.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because they also pick what does not go on it. Which means that the government says “this speech we endorse, but this speech we do not.”

Also you’re required to return or destroy plates in certain states when they send you new ones (every few years, or when purchasing a new vehicle). Doesn’t sound like they’re your property when the state reserves the right to ask for them back.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Fair points there on both accounts.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're right: that is unpopular.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey, I don't like tofu much either, but that's going way too far.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh "Love Tofu" not "Love To Fuck You"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Right that one is LOVE2FU

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

If you read the ACLU complaint their examples are less about political bias and more about just the arbitrary nature of the decisions. Most of their examples are "you approved this and therefore you shouldn't have rejected a similar thing". Like some approvers read the vague statute to say "BEERRUN" is ok, while others think "BEER4ME" is not. Which, ok, sure, maybe the MVD should send out a memo clarifying what's ok and what isn't, but is this actually lawsuit worthy? Are civil rights in South Dakota really doing so well that this is where the ACLU should be directing its limited funds?

And they're not just saying "be more consistent", they're demanding that every rejected license plate be approved when the policy is defined to reject:

“vulgar words, terms, or abbreviations[;]” that are “offensive or disrespectful of a race, religion, color, deity, ethnic heritage, gender, sexual orientation, disability status or political affiliation[;]"

So their examples are BEER4ME, but their suit is almost certainly going to also be freeing up plates like "DIEJEWS" and "WHTPWR".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Maybe it's just me because I work in a very high-crime area. But I always thought of vanity plates as a bad idea simply because they tell potential thieves "There's probably something in this car worth stealing."