668
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 hours ago

this was predicted. this is probably how the people who made this happen intended it to be.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Pro-life(s-being-lost-to-inhumane-laws)

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 16 points 5 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 10 points 5 hours ago

This is the only logical answer for this. Otherwise- their deaths mean nothing.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

That's not logical? It doesn't even have a legal basis.

The real logical answer to bad government management is the French one - protest

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

And if protests dont work as they often dont, then what? The guillotine. Thats a french thing nest pas?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago
[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago

Let me know how that goes.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

We might be headed toward the same conditions that spawned the French revolution. I'm not in favor of that but once the wealth transfer gets to a certain point there's historical president to draw upon.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

That isn’t going to happen. And in the very off chance that it does- the government is guaranteed the win, and the people will suffer.

Greatly.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The government is made of people. Those people might refuse to do their jobs too.

A protest is SUBSTANTIALLY more likely to happen than the original suggestion of charging state lawmakers with murder. There's no murder charge that would qualify.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago

Riiiiight. Well, have fun storming the castle. Just don’t make a mess on my street, okay? I don’t want to have to clean that shit up.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 2 hours ago

Who? And on what legal grounds?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

The state government. Legislature that drew up and ratified the murderous writs

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Okay, so is staff included in that? And what's the legal basis? What law could they be charged under for this?

[-] [email protected] 9 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

What is going on here? The laws came into place in September 2021, but mortality was already climbing from 2019-2021. What was going on those years to cause this? Then a sharp decline in mortality between 2021 and 2022 for two of the three groups.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago

Lockdown - domestic violence peaked during those years as well. Abusive men often use birth/pregnancy to abuse their partners, because they feel like their partner is obligated to be with them now that they share a child. There can also be some jealousy issues from the man towards the baby or the wife, since they get special treatment especially during pregnancy and right after.

So you'll see more stuff like deliberate poisoning (including sneakily feeding foods unsafe for pregnant women), beatings, rape. They will also delay or deny medical treatment.

Oh actually, that's probably a big reason too - people stopped going to the doctor during those years because we were told not to. It was too busy and overwhelmed. We were told you'd get covid and miscarry if you went in to the doctor also. Prenatal care is HUGE for preventing deaths during birth. My guess is a combo of factors.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 5 hours ago

20/21 was also peak Covid, so could be connected.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I really wish the article talked about those years rather than just comparing 2019 to 2022, given that 2022 is a drop compared to 2021. Or if the article had showed the same chart with national data of those same years 2019-2022 for a good compare and contrast visual to show the national mortality rate climb and then post-Covid drop. As it is, the law goes into place and then mortality rate drops, which could easily be a talking point in its favor, even if it may be a deceptive point. By not addressing that, and instead glossing over the article seems incomplete.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago

Defunding of women's health programs such as planned parenthood started long before the actual ban

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

But then overall mortality went down in 2022 compared to 2021?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

Covid was going down by then I think.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

The comment I replied to said the spike was due to woman's programs being defunded. I don't know if it was that, or covid, or something else. Right now it appears everyone is speculating the reason. Some detail, specifically some from the article would have been helpful. In its face, the article is blaming a 2021 law for a rise in mortality between 2019-2022, despite the mortality rate declining overall after the law went into effect. I don't think that's the whole story, but the article seems to gloss over it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 28 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

It's pathetic these clowns call themselves pro-life without vomiting. Their platform is based entirely around murdering pregnant women. They don't care how many times you explain this is essential healthcare, they are happy to let these women die because in their mind they deserve it for daring to try and save their own life with an abortion. It will be so sad and predictable when they find out the women in their life get ectopic pregnancies too, I wonder how much their lives are worth to these dishonest ghouls.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

To them, hypocrisy is a virtue. This is all about power and has nothing to do with integrity.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 18 points 9 hours ago

For the party of "small government", they sure like getting in people's business.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

You'd think this would give republicans pause, or make them reconsider.

Young women dying in dramatically increasing numbers.

But it won't.

All these young women left to die on the altar of their misinterpretation of their religion and their uncaring principles.

But no, it was a policy born in hate and the tragic imposed deaths of women are not an unfortunate side effect, they're just misogyny in action. Working itself out.

If they cared about babies, there would be more support for women, for early years interventions, and maybe they might also care about children dying in schools on the altar of their misunderstanding of their 2nd amendment and their uncaring principles.

But no, they don't care about children dying in schools either, and do you know why? Because caring about children dying in schools doesn't involve telling women what they have to do and ruling their lives with oppressive freedom-denying laws.

Caring about children dying in schools would involve some infringement on their UNDENYABLE RIGHT TO FEEL IMPORTANT with a gun and caring about women dying in childbirth would interfere with their UNDENYABLE RIGHT TO FEEL IMPORTANT with a rule about what women can and can't do.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 9 points 10 hours ago

Pro-Life ... LOL

[-] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago

I'm not aure why they don't consider the fetus a home invader and try to invoke stand your ground laws.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
668 points (98.7% liked)

News

22901 readers
3850 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS