135
submitted 23 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 29 points 22 hours ago

Tyrants recognized centuries ago that the surest way to guarantee the enthusiasm and loyalty of their mercenary thugs was to let them loot their victims.

And nothing really has changed since then.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 22 hours ago

What exactly happens with things taken through civil forfeiture...? Like... Who gets it? Is it sold/auctioned? Who gets the money...?

[-] [email protected] 13 points 21 hours ago

The police department gets it. If you want your money back it's the seized money vs the state in a court, not you personally vs the state, the money itself vs the state.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago

But like... What does the department do with it? Do they just give it to indevual cops? If it's money does it become part of their budget?

Also, the case is "your money" vs " the state"? How the fuck does that work? This shit is so confusing 😅

[-] [email protected] 10 points 19 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

Thank you!!

[-] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago

John aged a bit like Obama.

Hope I do as well.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 19 hours ago

These laws, like so many, were initially put into place to punish drug dealers. But like most laws geared towards the War on Drugs™ the cops realized they could use it against anyone and gleefully have ever since. It's not just money, they'll seize a person's home even if the homeowner had no idea their child or guest had drugs there.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

Yup, in most states, it's anything the money COULD have been used on, and it's on you to prove the money was not used towards that item. You paid for new brakes on your car while gainfully employed, but you were also selling weed? Some part of that money WAS from drug sales - your car is now ours.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago

Goes into the budget is my understanding. It becomes departmental funds.

Very very poorly for the individual because your intent cannot be factored into the case. The money itself has to be proven innocent from criminal activity. It's essentially designed to be as hard as possible for the individual to get their money back. I am not a lawyer and I am pulling this from memory so i could be wildly off base with this.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago

If Wikipedia is accurate, it varies a bit by state, but it seems like your memory is accurate for many of them.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago

Are we finally ready to introduce this conversation to the larger political stage?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago

How much of this is drug related to. The drug laws do no one any good.

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
135 points (99.3% liked)

Progressive Politics

900 readers
396 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS