255
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Three Mile Island was the worst nuclear accident in US history. Was mainly caused by poor design of human feedback systems which caused operational confusion and lead to a catastrophic failure.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago

Wow Bethesda is really going all out to promote Fallout.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Brb gettig my Nuka cola

[-] [email protected] 74 points 3 days ago

AI better cure cancer if we're using this much energy on it.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 3 days ago

The development of ACP_196 did use AI for huge portions of the raw sequencing and simulation, for what thats worth...

[-] [email protected] 27 points 3 days ago

for what that is worth

A lot if you ask me. Unfortunately this will mostly be LLMs and image generators using this power probably.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

and user activity analyzer and recommendation systems, when looking at copilot

[-] [email protected] 79 points 3 days ago

!fuck_[email protected]

Seriously, we need the less carbon-emitting plants to replace the dirty coal ones, not come online just to power the AI hype :smh:

[-] [email protected] 40 points 3 days ago

If/when the ai hype train crashes, it would already be online and therefore a good argument can be made to redirect the power to the grid instead of the then-defunct project

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

That's true, but this reactor had been operating for decades, until 2019. Methane was too cheap (and didn't have to pay for its waste) and made it unprofitable, so they stopped. Presumably the price MS is willing to lock in at makes it profitable for them again. I assume they predict prices going up or they're getting it cheap.

Keep in mind, MS has only signed an agreement to buy 100% of the output, not the reactor itself.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Maybe true. But if we have increased energy demand it might as well be nuclear.

Halting ai development might be nice according to many people, but we cant make that happen. Fraud alone is magnitudes more rampant. Its here to stay and we have to deal with it. I think this is a big win.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] [email protected] 40 points 3 days ago

If you hate nuclear energy because you think it's dangerous or polluting, that is as dumb as choosing to drive instead of taking the train for the same reasons.

Nuclear energy is one of the methods of generating electricity with the smallest environmental impact and also much, much safer than the alternatives. The number of nuclear accidents can be counted on one hand, while the number of people who have died from cancer from coal power plants is conservatively estimated to be in the millions.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Nuclear energy produces waste that burdens present and virtually all future generations. There is no operating repository anywhere in the world. And even if there were, the question of the risks to future generations will always be one that, from today's perspective, can only be answered in a projection-based manner. Positing that the issues of final disposal and long-term safety for the next one million years have been technically solved is thus insufficient. (https://www.base.bund.de/SharedDocs/Kurzmeldungen/BASE/EN/2021/1109-brussels-nuclear-energy-is-not-green.html)

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Completely valid point, but I think it's important to talk about the amount of waste produced compared to other methods and how the comparably negligible amounts are manageable until we decide to clean it or "fire it off at the sun" or whatever.

It isn't even close to comparable for the amount of environmental impact coal or plastic has had.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

I mean, comparing that to coal isn't a very impressive feat. Nuclear power is very expensive, fission material is limited and sourced from dodgy countries, storage is difficult etc. The emissions are the only good thing about it. There are good alternatives to that. I guess using the existing ones until they need to be decommissioned is still a good idea though.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (54 replies)
[-] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago

bro just one more ~~lane~~ power plant bro, bro I swear just one more and it'll fix the ~~traffic~~ energy demands bro

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
255 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

58201 readers
3700 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS