367
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 11 points 5 hours ago

I'm just here to watch people who cheered and defended the lady who wouldn't marry a gay couple suddenly care about government employees doing their job regardless of opinion.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 minutes ago* (last edited 2 minutes ago)

I agree but this logic cuts both ways.

The people that disliked the courthouse lady shouldn't be too surprised or upset now that the shoe's on the other foot.

[-] [email protected] 46 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I understand where they are coming from, but its not their job to dictate what mail gets delivered.

and it opens the door for right wingers to do the same if they do not get serious punishment for this.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 5 hours ago

Yeah like I agree with the thought but the mail is kinda sacred.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

yep. Don't fuck with the mail.

Especially in the times we are in right now.

Which is why these carriers, as must as I sympathize with not wanting to deal with the hateful messages, need to be punished severely and swiftly.

[-] [email protected] 44 points 18 hours ago

Good. This is the same as a pharmacist refusing to fill a prescription due to personal beliefs. You took a job knowing what it would entail.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 14 hours ago

The Post Office disseminating hateful propaganda is bad, actually, and just because the law currently requires Postal workers to do it doesn't make it right.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Their free speech is bad. OK.

What does that have to do with delivering the mail as the carrier takes an oath to do ?

Or was professionalism in the civil service bullshit from the start ?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Their free speech is bad. OK.

Yeah, hate speech is bad. IDGAF about your free speech when that speech is "I think this group I don't like should be eliminated or removed from society."

If this were a conservative refusing to deliver liberal info you'd call the refusal free speech itself and argue firing her is illegal - so y'all can sit the fuck down.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago

So a pharmacist should be allowed to refuse selling e.g. birth control, due to personal beliefs? Everyone can just decide who they want to service for any reason, right?

[-] [email protected] 33 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

the post office is right to punish her for not doing her job, but she is also right to sacrifice her job for an act of civil disobedience. they are both right. the only person who's a piece of shit here is the one sending the mail.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago

That. What this parent did was a laudable act of civil disobedience. Unfortunately, the post office did what they had to do.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 25 points 18 hours ago

This is hateful shit.

Unfortunately, they have the same argument as Kim Davis for not doing their duty.

They both refuse to do their duty due to moral concerns.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago

Hate speech doesn't get protected under free speech. These aren't the same.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago

In the US, it is. In Canada (assuming this applies to Canada - I don’t know), I don’t know if you want postal workers deciding what is or isn’t hate speech.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 10 hours ago

Under US law, there is absolutely no "hate speech" exception to the 1st amendment. This has been ruled on repeatedly.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 10 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

I saw the Grumman LLV mail truck in the thumbnail and just assumed US. I had no idea you guys used them too. Neat!

[-] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

...Which is why I specified US. (Yes, I know where NB is.)

Most of the people here are arguing from a US perspective, esp. since the original source largely reports on US news, and reports on news from a US perspective.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

Fun geographical place names time: there’s also a New Brunswick in New Jersey and a New Brunswick in Indiana, and there’s also a New Jersey in New Brunswick and an Indiana in Ontario. There’s also an Ontario in California. But wait, there’s also a California in Ontario. This is where our geographical journey ends for now.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 43 minutes ago

I have no idea what the fuck you just did to my brain, but I want my money back.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago

Yes it does/yes it is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 36 points 22 hours ago

Just so people can judge for themselves...

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 hours ago

Good to see that conservatives are focused on the widespread problems that really matter to people internationally and not just down here in the US!

/s

[-] [email protected] 9 points 8 hours ago

“God doesn’t make mistakes.” This has to be the best argument I have ever seen. Just wow… Can’t god also solve the 3x+1 problem? Would be useful.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Don't wear Glasses or use viagra as God intended.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

this is a phrase I've started to turn around in a trans-affirming way: god doesn't make mistakes, do you really think he couldn't conceive of a trans person?

[-] [email protected] 23 points 20 hours ago

And if she pull this the Georgia mail carrier pulls the abortion and lgbt mail. Let people get the hate mail. The only ones it convinces are those that already agree everyone else just trashes it. Postal Carriers should deliver regardless of sender or recipient. This just does DeJoy's work for him.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

The article is about events in Canada.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago

Apples to oranges comparison. Facilitating speech is not automatically a neutral action. Facilitating hate speech is bad and censoring hatemongers is good. The law is irrelevant to the question of morality.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Really, you want someone going through your mail deciding what you get? What if I'm the judge of what you get, are you still happy?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
367 points (96.5% liked)

News

22901 readers
4407 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS