379
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 18 points 16 hours ago

The Post Office disseminating hateful propaganda is bad, actually, and just because the law currently requires Postal workers to do it doesn't make it right.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Their free speech is bad. OK.

What does that have to do with delivering the mail as the carrier takes an oath to do ?

Or was professionalism in the civil service bullshit from the start ?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Their free speech is bad. OK.

Yeah, hate speech is bad. IDGAF about your free speech when that speech is "I think this group I don't like should be eliminated or removed from society."

If this were a conservative refusing to deliver liberal info you'd call the refusal free speech itself and argue firing her is illegal - so y'all can sit the fuck down.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago

So a pharmacist should be allowed to refuse selling e.g. birth control, due to personal beliefs? Everyone can just decide who they want to service for any reason, right?

[-] [email protected] 34 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

the post office is right to punish her for not doing her job, but she is also right to sacrifice her job for an act of civil disobedience. they are both right. the only person who's a piece of shit here is the one sending the mail.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago

That. What this parent did was a laudable act of civil disobedience. Unfortunately, the post office did what they had to do.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 12 hours ago

Yes. Exactly. But that's the original point: you accept the job with the understanding that, if you find a particular aspect of the job to be against your morals, and you refuse to perform your job due to your morals, that you may be disciplined and/or fired.

The wrinkle here is that pharmacists have some degree is 1a protections (in the US) because their objections are on religious grounds rather than humanist ones. That makes firing them difficult, because it can be argued that it's religious discrimination. An obvious solution would be to require them to refer the person to another pharmacy, so that they aren't violating their religion, but pharmacists are arguing that's compelled speech that still violates their 1a rights.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

nobody should ever be granted special privileges based on religion or political beliefs. the postal service and the pharmacy face the same moral circumstances in these two scenarios.

civil disobedience is still disobedience. you do it because you believe its right, and you accept the consequences.

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
379 points (96.6% liked)

News

22901 readers
4520 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS