192
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Wanna know why prices everywhere went up so much? They had to pay all the advertising companies for the billions of ads they’ve been trying to force us to watch everywhere, from tv to internet to roadside billboards. So the consumer had to pay.

(No, not really, but it sure feels that way)

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Unfortunately, it may be difficult to do much without some kind of intervention at a larger scale (i.e. government intervention) but so much money is made from these ads. Money talks. There are also people who don’t know about ad blockers or simply don’t care to run one.

I do agree with one comment below of static advertisements to promote a product or service . It reminds me something like tv commercials. The targeted ones is just asking for trouble for your privacy and getting scammed.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 10 hours ago

I still think targeted ads should be illegal. I would accept static ads that are based on the content of the site rather than me as a compromise.

So like if I'm looking at example.com/cool-bikes you can show me bike ads. You don't need to know who I am or track me.

It's good enough for the past few decades (centuries?) it's good enough for now. The Superbowl doesn't serve a different ad to every viewer.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

And targetted ads aren't that much more effective than context based. So the internet has been compromised, misinformation has run rife, and platforms hijacked to threaten democratic nations so some corporations can have 6% more effective advertising. What a deal. I believe thats the approx effectiveness difference.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

Yeah or bike adjacent stuff.. helmet, chain lube.. hell even a biking vacation.. but stop with the profiling

[-] [email protected] 15 points 21 hours ago

Advertising needs to become as socially acceptable as smoking.

It indiscriminately pollutes the environments it’s projected in to, and causes secondary harms to non-participants by incentivising the mass hoarding of personal information which is uneconomical to appropriately secure.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

Don't people use ad blockers? If not, learn how to use one instead to complain.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

Yeah I see seeing ads as a skill issue tbh

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Here's what I do about it:

[-] [email protected] 43 points 1 day ago

Firefox plus uBlock Origin is what you can do about it. I hardly ever see any ads. SponsorBlock is great if you watch youtube too.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Because US capitalism.

[-] [email protected] 74 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Garbage ads have been a thing almost since the dawn of the Internet and we found a solution to them years ago. They're called ad blockers. If you are online and not using an ad blocker: Why? That's like finding a $2/night hooker and not using a condom.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago

The article did mention ad-blockers:

Some users take back control from online ads by installing ad-blocker software. These can be free versions in the form of a browser extension, or more advanced versions with a subscription fee.

I think you underestimate how technologically illiterate the average person is. Many people do not even understand the difference between a web browser and a search engine - they use Chrome because they think that's the only way to perform a Google search.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

My kids are not what I’d call tech illiterate but they are growing up with all of it taken for granted. They don’t really understand the terms “internet” as distinct from “website” as distinct from “your phone.” It’s just kind of all “on your phone” to them.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ew. Speaking of technological illiteracy, the author is irresponsibly contributing to it by insinuating that subscription fee ad blockers are somehow inherently better than free ones, which is not only absolute bullshit but also pretty much anti-Free Software propaganda.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

I was promised that surveillance capitalism would mean high quality ads that improved my quality of living. :blessed:

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

When I can’t block the ads, I always opt for the “non-personalized ads” option, since I know they are getting paid less. Also easier to ignore an ad when it is random.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Garbage ads predate the internet.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

$2/a night? Okay Mr Moneybags, must be nice to be so rich!

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Eloquently/elegantly put

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

What really annoys me is the endless stream of scam, "earn money fast with 1 simple trick" ads

It's literally a scam every single time and trying to report those fall into deaf ears (or blind algorithms) because hey, they're paying to be shown, why should any high ranking executive care? "Oh, I can't be held responsible, sorry!"

[-] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago

For example, Google Chrome has stopped the use of auto-play video.

Even setting aside ads, that was virtually always something that I did not want.

If websites like CNN want someone to watch video, put the video up with autoplay off. If someone wants to watch it, they can start it playing.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

But then they can't ~~force you to watch~~ claim that you watched the ad at the start of the video for that sweet advertiser revenue.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

The reason is programmatic advertising and Google has 90% market share there. Btw, it helps spreading misinformation too.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago

🤷‍♂️

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Remember the purpose of ads is to advertise a product that might potentially sell. Quality control isn't always a priority it's capitalism after all. At the end of the day, if you just want to block ads, just block ads.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

there are products that I would buy if I would know they exist but I don't because they don't have enough money to do advertisment. It's inherently an unfair competition. The only ads that I would like to see is a tematical search for all of the buyable products and services.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)
***
that might potentially sell
+++ that is pushed with money
[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

Because it's "too hard" for websites to have proper relationships with advertisers vs just signing onto an ad network.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

The AI generated car ads are just awful, I made a post about it:

https://lemmy.world/post/14053496

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

What can we do about it? Is this some grandpa's first time on the internet?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
192 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

58133 readers
4724 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS