480
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 14 points 10 hours ago

Hey @[email protected], you were saying that "these were extremely surgical strikes, people in the vicinity weren't harmed"?

Thousands of people injured, all guilty of something ofc, because Israel would never do an attack which might harm innocents. Right? /S

[-] [email protected] -2 points 8 hours ago

fairly sure hezbollah has more than 2800 members

[-] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago

You're genuinely pathetic enough to try and imply that none of the victims are innocent?

I loathe "people" like you.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

I think they're implying this mostly hit Hezbollah members, not than none of the victims were innocent.

That said, you do know Hezbollah is basically the same as Israel, just without the backing of the USA, right? They also want genocide. The way this was dealt with was one of the best options when dealing with a group that wants to genocide your country. It also shows Israel chose to start the war with Hamas, and likely allowed the October 7 attack to happen, if they've had this capability all along.

The dad who's girl died literally brought this on himself. He chose religious fanaticism over family. He's in Lebanon, not Gaza, not West Bank - he could have chosen not to be part of a group that wants to wipe out a whole nother group. This is on him the same way it's on an antivaxxer when they're kid gets sick. There's plenty of damn good reasons to wish Netanyahu dead and in hell, but this ain't one. I doubt him and his right wing extremist possé came up with this operation since they would have deliberately chosen something with way more innocent casualties.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

I think they’re implying this mostly hit Hezbollah members, not than none of the victims were innocent.

Based on... what exactly?

The clear implication is that "number of Hezbollah member > victims = no innocent victims."

And then you instantly jump into defending genocide. Holy fucking shit I honestly can't communicate with words how disgustingly pathetic I find that.

No, I'm not gonna engage with your whataboutism and start arguing with you about how "Hezbollah deserved this absolutely pathetic terrorist attack."

"Brought it on himself brought it on himself"

You fuckers still haven't realised that Hammurabi's law makes the whole world blind, huh? That was almost 4000 years ago, ffs. Read a book, preferably a modern one and not some tome of propaganda from thousands of years ago.

You're literally defending the death of a 9-year old girl. You have to be sick in the fucking head to do that. Honestly.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

And you should read Popper's Paradox of Tolerance.

Eye for an eye makes the world go blind only works when one party doesn't exist solely to exterminate another.

That's what Hezbollah is.

I have never defended genociders - you on the other hand keep defending Hezbollah.

The world needs to deal with Hezbollah the same way it needs to deal with Zionism and the same way it eventually dealt with the Nazis.

Tell me dumbass, do you think Netanyahu and co. will stop his campaign on Gaza if everyone decided not to retaliate? Or would he just order his men to take advantage of the situation and shoot them down? Do you think the Nazis or any other group, such as Hezbollah, intent on genocide would accept peace?

Of course ideally such corrupt evil fucks could be eliminated with no innocent casualties. But that's unfortunately not the way the world works. Do you think innocent casualties didn't occur when other fascist evils were fought? You think only military personnel were killed in WW2?

You're either a naïve kid, or have thought up of miracle solution like a death note.

This was a case of monsters fighting monsters; we're lucky that this at least was an actual very precise strike one monster did to the others, rather than their usual M.O. of just striking buildings with missiles.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

You're seriously saying "they deserve the 'eye-for-an-eye' treatment" while Israel is actively escalating the conflict?

I have never defended genociders

Oh okay. So where have I done that? In assuming that 3000 civilians who were harmed weren't exclusively Hezbollah? Which would be an utterly ridiculous claim seeing how many literal children there are involved.

So.. you've never defended genociders. Then let's see if you will. Is Israel committing a genocide in Gaza?

You think only military personnel were killed in WW2?

I've actually been in the military and have had training on what is and isn't legal to do in armed conflict. Have you?

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/customary-ihl/v1/rule12

Rule 12. Definition of Indiscriminate Attacks

Rule 12. Indiscriminate attacks are those: (a) which are not directed at a specific military objective;

(b) which employ a method or means of combat which cannot be directed at a specific military objective; or

(c) which employ a method or means of combat the effects of which cannot be limited as required by international humanitarian law; and consequently, in each such case, are of a nature to strike military objectives and civilians or civilian objects without distinction.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Anyone else confused about how these bombs are actually detonating? Articles say they are detonating via a text message sent 3x in error, theoretically causing either a spark or a "closed circuit" like a different article explained. The article (from al jazeera) says they have to look at the message but there's video of one igniting in a bag.

I'm curious because I think these pagers may actually constitute a public safety risk, similar to how heavily landmined areas risk exploding even decades later on someone unrelated to the initial conflict.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 10 hours ago

Nothing in an electronic device, save for a very overvolted capacitor, could come anywhere near to as explosive as these were. Even LiPo batteries don't explode like that.

These were explosives planted in the devices when being manufactured.

Not sure if you've seen videos of the explosions or the aftermath.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Both, al jazeera source says the explosive inside is PETN. What I'm asking is how tf did text messages and whatever in the walkie talkies ignite a spark strong enough to ignite the PETN? Is that true? Or is it possible some of these are still live or ignited in a faulty way? What is the risk to the public?

Afaik such an idea was nonsense previously. Why are we taking their word that this is sophisticated at any level when they've been simply brutal up to now?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

Isreal wants to start ww3!

[-] [email protected] 9 points 17 hours ago

Israel has a reckoning coming. The mercy they have shown is the mercy they will receive. I wish they would stop.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
480 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

58133 readers
5120 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS