26
Plans to Modernize Notre-Dame’s Stained-Glass Windows Move Ahead Despite Heritage Experts' Rejection (www.smithsonianmag.com)
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Honestly, I'm for it, especially once I read the part about them having been modernized once before. Notre Dame is neither a museum or a ruin (or at least, not a 'natural'/pre-existing ruin, for lack of a better term); it's a working church in continuous use and should be treated as such.

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for them also recreating the 19^th^ century ones (and the 12^th^ century ones too, if they have good references for them), but then displaying them elsewhere as a museum exhibit. (It could be in the context of an exhibit about stained glass art, or one about the history of the cathedral, or even one about the fire and reconstruction specifically.)

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Couldn't they just replicate the original design?

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

Why? Every single remodelation of any major cathedral included some contemporary elements, why should we stop things as they were in the early 19th century?

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
26 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

1300 readers
635 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in [email protected]. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @[email protected], @[email protected], or @[email protected].

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]