93
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Elon Musk-controlled satellite internet provider Starlink has told Brazil's telecom regulator Anatel it will not comply with a court order to block social media platform X in the country until its local accounts are unfrozen.

Anatel confirmed the information to Reuters on Monday after its head Carlos Baigorri told Globo TV it had received a note from Starlink, which has more than 200,000 customers in Brazil, and passed it onto Brazil's top court.

Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes last week ordered all telecom providers in the country to shut down X, which is also owned by billionaire Musk, for lacking a legal representative in Brazil.

The move also led to the freezing of Starlink's bank accounts in Brazil. Starlink is a unit of Musk-led rocket company SpaceX. The billionaire responded to the account block by calling Moraes a "dictator."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 47 points 1 week ago

The comments here are weird TBH. No, Brazil will not start shooting down satellites. It can just simply outlaw and sanction Starlink, stop anyone from paying Starlink for their internet subscription, and have peeps go around and confiscate ground stations.

Also, they can just go and ask the US to help enforce their ruling, telling them "do you want to be friends with us or Musky boi?"

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

That's a really good point. Starlink can ignore this order, but the courts can order banks to stop processing payments to them. Pretty sure Starlink isn't going to "protest" this at the cost of profits.

Of rourse Starlink could then go be further shady by taking payments in Bitcoin to get around it. It's an interesting arms race to follow.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Brazil is well within its rights to sanction Starlink and prosecute people for evading said sanctions, and have people pay fines and go to prison for buying Starlink with Bitcoin.

Just like the US does with Iran and Cuba.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately, the US is now fully reliant on SpaceX for access to space now that they decided to rely on corporate spacecraft rather than building our own and Boeing has proven themselves unreliable since that change was made, and now that they finally have a craft they ended up stranding astronauts on the space station until SpaceX can rescue them due to defects. Plus we can't use Russia like we did after the shuttle program ended but corporate space travel wasn't there yet. And SpaceX isn't publicly traded to where it might be possible that enough investors could pressure Musk to cave.

So I doubt anything will come of it. Brazil will rattle their sabers. Musk will stand his ground, and the US will stay on Musk's side while pretending as much as possible to be staying out of it.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

Haha, that sort of dependency can be just as dangerous for a company as it is for the state. You start fucking around like that and antitrust and defense production act start knocking.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Is there precedent for the US government just flat out nationalizing a company like SpaceX?

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Don't have to. Defense production act allows them to legally direct the company without owning it.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

No 737 has ever leaked helium. So why did the Star liner leak helium? Why couldn't it just pop an emergency exit hatch mid flight like standard procedure? Why? Why? So many questions!

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Easier than than just freeze musks money in brazil

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Lol, then I guess they can provide that access for free, indefinitely, all for just making sure they keep 200K (max) people in Brazil on Xitter.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago

Why does the weird one think that he should have more power than a government?

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Daddy didn't say no enough?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Why does the weird one think that he should have more power than a government?

Because he quite literally does in a lot of cases. When is he ever punished?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

His life experiences? Having that much money and power really fucks with someone's perceptions of the world.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Money and racism

load more comments (53 replies)
[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago

He really thinks he is above the law.

Why can't musk get stranded in space like these astronauts at ISS. We would all be better off.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean to be fair, Starlink is a satellite network.

Edit: this is a shitty Dad joke for those that are taking my comment seriously.

Most of you don't deserve your humor license if you have one

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Yeah, and they can do in space whatever they want (probably). But if they want to operate on earth providing a service within a country, they have to abide by the law of this country or stay out of it.

It's like American Internet companies have to follow EU law if they want to operate in the EU, even if the company itself or their servers are in the US. GDPR privacy laws is a good example.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

To be more fair, Brazil is a sovereign country, Starlink is not.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No I mean it's literally a satellite network. It's in orbit.

It's above the law. Literally.

Edit: a lot of people whooshing this. How? It's so fucking simple.

Orbit = Space. Brazil = Earth.

Space altitude > Brazil Altitude.

Orbit is literally above guys. Like come the fuck on. It's a funny joke.

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

He's good for absolutely nothing in this world. The only true altruistic path for him would be euthanasia and donating his water to the tribe.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

He's arguing that it's illegal because they are separate entities.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Supreme Court ordered all telecom providers in the country to shut down X

If Starlink refuses to comply or hinders others to comply, they are in contempt to the Supreme Court orders.
As long as this order is within the law, it shouldn't matter if Starlink and X are connected or not.

And even if they are in orbit "above" the law, the ruling is only about their operating in brazil not about the satellite itself. And their operations within the country of Brazil do have to comply with Brazilian law and courts.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

I wonder what would happen if a Brazilian company failed to comply with a US court order.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

They may get forbidden from operating in the US? Like, the same thing, in reverse?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

They'd be getting ready for some FREEDOM!!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

As of 2024-09-03T22:10:25.545Z, Starlink is now complying with Brazil's X ban [1].

References

  1. "Starlink says it will block X in Brazil". Emma Roth. The Verge. Published: 2024-09-03T22:10:25.545Z. Accessed: 2024-09-04T04:17Z. https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/3/24235204/starlink-block-x-brazil-comply-elon-musk.

    “We immediately initiated legal proceedings in the Brazilian Supreme Court explaining the gross illegality of this order and asking the Court to unfreeze our assets,” Starlink says in a post on X. “Regardless of the illegal treatment of Starlink in freezing of our assets, we are complying with the order to block access to X in Brazil.”

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

When Republicans decide to have 4th of July at this judge's house then I'll believe he's a dictator.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

And starlink also gets banned from the country

Tesla next?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

the problem is starlink is actually a good thing, providing decent internet access to places that can't get it otherwise. I think the thing to target is the clear collusion going on between companies in ostensibly unrelated industries to pressure a government into reversing a penalty on one of them.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Starlink is a ridiculous centralized solution to what should be solved by upgrading fiber networks.

It's a bandaid with limited usefulness after maybe a decade. Basically an exercise in generating space junk.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

In a lot of cases I would agree with you, but laying fiber optic cable through the Amazon in order to connect remote settlements is not feasible, starlink really does have a good use case there.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

I think the thing to target is the clear collusion going on between companies in ostensibly unrelated industries to pressure a government into reversing a penalty on one of them.

Specifically because they are controlled by the same asshat. This is the same exact type of shit he does with stock manipulation and why he was eventually forced to buy Twitter. All his wealth has been generated by cheating and exploitation. I hope Brazil drops the hammer.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
93 points (98.9% liked)

World News

38531 readers
2201 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS