this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
2 points (75.0% liked)

World News

39011 readers
3141 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Lol. I can't believe that even in this case all the shits in the world decided to go into this together.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

This list contains over a hundred entries

I love to dunk on Elon as much as anyone but surely out of a hundred+ investors there's always going to be a shady Russian or two. And everyone with money in Russia will be related to an oligarch on the sanctions list.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Remember how Elon was very keen on limiting Starlink for Ukraine.

That makes a lot more sense now doesn't it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Glad this quy isn’t in charge for any large company that works for the government or something…

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Uh oh. Looks like ya boi’s on the steroid.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Remember even the Atkins guy fell, got injured, put on like 40 lbs overnight and died? Elon appears to be on that path. Ugly, failed, miserable, turd…

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Not all surprising, he's been pushing the russian narrative for a while now.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The news source of this post could not be identified. Please check the source yourself. Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Please fix your bot. I'm one of the few that actually appreciates it (especially in an election year, with disinformation everywhere), but why would anyone want spam that just says "don't know!" after every news story!? Either objectively and fairly rare sources, or say nothing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

However, Joe Lonsdale, the founder of 8VC, did comment, considering it a response to an attack by left-wing media for "supporting Trump." Lonsdale was referring to an article published by Forbes magazine describing his fund's connections with the sons of Russian oligarchs.

Forbes is "left-wing media" now?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Everything is left-wing media when you are a conservative troll. Just ask the Media Bias bot that will inevitably spew its propaganda at the bottom of this thread.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is an honest question because I see the media bias bot being consistently downvoted and don't understand why. Can you fill me in? Why is the media bias bot hated so much? It seems fairly reasonable in its assessments. For example:

  • Daily Vox: Left with High factuality
  • Huffington Post: Left with Mixed factuality
  • MSNBC: Left with Mixed factuality
  • NPR: Left-Center with High factuality
  • Reuters: Least Biased with Very High factuality
  • Forbes: Right-Center with Mostly Factual factuality
  • Fox: Extreme-Right with Mixed factuality
  • OAN: Extreme-Right with Low factuality
  • Newsmax: Extreme-Right with Low factuality
  • Infowars: Extreme-Right with Very Low factuality
    • Conspiracy Level: Tin Foil Hat
    • Pseudo-Sci Level: Strong
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

NPR, WAPO, NYT, BBC, and other papers that strive for objective reporting are all listed as leftist.

Even the terms, "left center" and "right center" are loaded. Go read an academic paper that includes polling. You're going to see terms like "non-aligned", "leans left", and "leans right". Because even the terms we use to discuss bias can induce bias.

There is a substantially pro conservative bias here when objective reporting is placed on the same level as a GOP controlled campaign website such as American Action Network.

Overall, we rate the American Action Network (AAN) as Right-Center biased based on political positions and advocacy that favor the right.

At best this is incompetent. At worst this is a long running misinformation op meant to wash right wing propaganda and make it look equal to reporting from The Guardian.

Speaking of which, they have a "mixed" credibility rating based on 5 failed fact checks from years ago. Which is the same rating Breitbart has with double the number of failed fact checks.

In the "long running misinformation op" category of evidence we have several libertarian websites marked as "right center" and "mixed" credibility. As a refresher for those of us who haven't taken a political ideology class, these are the guys who coined the phrase, "drown it in a bath tub" when referencing government. They are the guys running around arguing that your employer's corporation has more 1st and 2nd amendment rights than you do.

So yeah my money is on the guy who runs this thing being a libertarian trying to wash their ideology to look mainstream. Because when you think, the Ayn Rand Institute, and BBC, NYT, WAPO, NPR , and The Guardian all have the same level of bias, you've got some problems.