this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

17670 readers
21 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Threads is deepening its ties to the fediverse, also known as the open social web, which powers services like X alternative Mastodon, Pixelfed, PeerTube, Flipboard and other apps. On Wednesday, Meta announced that users on Threads will be able to see fediverse replies on other posts besides their own. In addition, posts that originated through the Threads API, like those created via third-party apps and scheduling services, will now be syndicated to the fediverse. The latter had previously been announced via an in-app message informing users that API posts would be shared to the fediverse starting on August 28."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

But why?

Simply put, there aren’t a lot of us, we don’t like them, and we aren’t particularly nice people, even to people we don’t dislike a priori.

It seems like a poor business decision.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Fuck off Zuck, you're not welcome here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Daily reminder to defederate from and block threads.net (and optionally all instances that do not do the same).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Defedding from threads always seems strange to me. Everyone says it's to protect your data from meta. But they can already get your data. Everything on the fediverse is public. They already have your data.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

@Dirk @MrScottyTay Also I think that one should ask the question, what Meta could do with the data and what it is doing with the data of their users. For their users they use the usage data to present them a feed that the users appreciate. Also they use it to place ads inside of their apps. Also they use the data to serve you ads outside of their system on ad networks that use data from Meta.

All of this is technically not possible for Fediverse users.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Defedding doesn't stop any of that though

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Public is not the same as public domain.

I'm not a lawyer, but Federation would probably imply consent to sharing the data. Whereas defederation would strongly imply you're not okay with sharing the data with that entity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You think they don't collect data illegally and anonymise it (but keep cohorts) for market research already? You sweet summer child

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It’s not about the data, but the community. Just like how Google killed IRC, big techs are always trying to embrace, extend and extinguish the services.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (11 children)

@Dirk @xelar thanks for your view, question: defederating with threads seems reasonable, but why would you defederate "second level" like this? I ask as the instance I'm in decided not to defederate with threads for now and I'm personally OK with that.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Maybe we should do a reverse embrace-extend-extinguish where we open everything up until the point that they start introducing ads to enshittify the platform. Then after that great migration say goodbye to them

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

They can't place ads in your feeds.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

That’s exactly the point. There are a lot of users on Threads who might be happy with the Fediverse. Threads will undoubtedly need a put in ads in their app/instance, their enshittification is inevitable. If it becomes easy for users to move over to more friendly Fediverse instances, that is a win.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They can still train ML models (create profit) from the data they get from you without consent.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

They can do that no matter if I federate with them or not.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (9 children)

they technically could do this by representing ads with posts.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Most platforms (especially reddit, instagram, twitter) moved ads from ad-dedicated spaces, to authentic-seeming posts, that are actually ads.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Sure, but that cannot happen here.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Exactly. Proudly presented by https://fedipact.veganism.social/ and https://fedipact.online/why among others.

You can read the human rights abuses that meta is facilitating above.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That same Meta that performs emotional manipulation experiments on its users without informing them or receiving their consent? No, thank you!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

To be fair, this is describing all advertising.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Who's the artist of the image? I like the art style

Also the scared Lemmy and mastodon :( I feel bad for them

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

David Revoy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Embrace, extend, extinguish.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (6 children)

It's awesome that Threads federate with Mastodon. I follow several accounts on Threads I otherwise wouldn't be able to, just as I bridge with Bluesky.

Me federating with Threads makes absolutely no difference whatsoever to what they could or could not do with my data.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

The largest social media operator in the world had to adopt open source concepts and ActivityPub in order to compete. I see this as a huge win.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Unpopular opinion: Threads deepening ties to the fediverse is actually a really good thing for the fediverse as a whole.

I feel like realistically the fediverse will never gain mainstream adoption on its own. People like to believe in this beautiful future where the fediverse "wins out" and beats all the major social media networks, but I just don't see this happening. This is why I think Threads is actually really important for the growth of the fediverse and realistically one of the only paths to broad adoption.

Beyond this, I also separately really like the idea of being able to use a platform like Threads with my irl friends while still having access to open source clients etc. (ie. preventing situations like the Twitter API debacle which fucked over 3rd party clients)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›