Can't have secret talk amongst the peasants
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
199 points (97.6% liked)
Technology
58833 readers
4943 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Telegram, including secret chats, is not blocked because Russian elites happen to use that, too.
I could put on my tinfoil hat and say if signal is blocked but telegram isn’t, maybe that means that telegram isn’t as secret as they make it out to be.
It's open source. Look can up the encryption yourself.
No need, all you have to do is read the whitepaper. they home brewed the encryption algorithm and nobody actually knows if it's worth a damn. That's not exactly a secret.
And it isn't even encrypted by default, you manually have to enable that. By default, all your plain text messages are stored on their servers.
nobody actually knows if it’s worth a damn.
After all these years, security researchers still don't know if the encryption is any good?
On that level it usually falls on computer scientists. Formal methods can prove that any implementation is correct, but proving the absence of unintended attacks is a lot harder.
Needham-Schroeder comes to mind as an example from back when I was studying the things.
On that level it usually falls on computer scientists.
And not a single one has been able to analyze the encryption in all these years? Fact is, Telegram is the tool the Russian opposition and even Ukrainians use to communicate without Putin being able to infiltrate.
No. It kind of falls on Dijkstra's old statement. "Testing can only prove the presence, not absence of bugs."
You can prove logical correctness of code, but an abstract thing such as "is there an unknown weakness" is a bit harder to prove. The tricky part is coming up with the correct constraints to prove.
Security researchers tend to be on the testing side of things.
A notable example is how DES got its mixers changed between proposal and standardisation. The belief at the time was that the new mixers had some unknown backdoor for the NSA. AFAIK, it has never been proven.
They don't have reproducible builds afaik (unlike Signal). You can have a completely different code running on your phone than on GitHub.
Besides, who is using Secret Chat anyways? All default chats and group chats are unencrypted.
You can have a completely different code running on your phone than on GitHub.
Just use the F-Droid version if there is any doubt.
Besides, who is using Secret Chat anyways?
Probably Russians who used Signal before.
The F-droid version is also not reproducible. The binary you install has a different hash than the one you build from the GitHub.
It's reproducible if you compare it with F-droid's tarball, which has all the source code in it.
The F-droid version is also not reproducible. The binary you install has a different hash than the one you build from the GitHub.
F-Droid builds from source, so any suspicion whether the Google Play version has been tampered is completely irrelevant for the F-Droid version.
Can it be proven that that encryption is what's used in practice?
Telegram is shady as fuck and also afaik only uses end to end encryption in „secret“ one on one chats.
Telegram is shady as fuck and also afaik only uses end to end encryption in „secret“ one on one chats.
I was very explicitly referring to secret chats.
Youtube, signal blocked. What is Putin afraid of?
Details or continued news of Ukraines special military operation to denazify Russia?
Signal over Proton VPN Stealth protocol. All free, specifically for these types of situations.
Signal needs a phone number though
They did away with that some time ago.
EDIT: To clarify, it no longer shows the number.
They never stopped requiring a phone number to sign up.
They just let you hide this from other users now
I'm planning to get a prepaid burner to try signal but I'm a bit concerned about the fact my contacts are associated with a phone #
We are using simplex ATM
Yes. I clarified that in a different comment. My original reply was not meant as "Signal is the best solution" but as a heads up that Proton Stealth can not only bypass the block but also disguise the traffic if you want to continue using Signal.
That's not really the issue though, if you want to stay anonymous and not tell the government you use signal, since sms is insecure
Works with VoIP numbers though
Non-paywalled: https://archive.is/9MEKt
Not seeing paywall myself, clearing cookies and other site data might also help.
Snowden unavailable for comment.
I hope Roskomnadzor doesn't chase after the fediverse next.
How would you? You’d have to block every instance.
They could start by blocking the biggest instances, then slowly chasing after the smaller ones.
There's not an infinite amount of instances, even if new ones are made, they'll get all of them eventually. So this is basically a cat and mouse game.
I wonder what messaging service the Russian govt will use.