One day religion will cease to exist. I suspect it'll only be when humans cease to exist, but it will happen. Either case, it'll be a good day for the planet.
this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
47 points (100.0% liked)
U.S. News
2244 readers
32 users here now
News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.
Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Post the original source of information as the link.
- If there is any Nazi imagery in the linked story, mark your post NSFW.
- If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
- Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
- Social media is not a news source.
For World News, see the News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I'm very curious about what content in a Judy Blume book met the “pornographic or indecent material" burden mentioned in the article.
Other states hoping to finally be able to become a completely Christian-run entity will be taking notes.
My guess is that Judy Blume writes about girls going through puberty and getting periods as a normal, frank discussion of what that's like. And any talk about the bodies of women and girls is indecent to conservatives.
That's not true! Conseratives love to talk about the bodies of women when blaming them for making men horny or how victims of rape should be forced to give birth.
They just hate any kind of positive and accepting talk about women's bodies.
The less girls know about their own body, the easier it is to take advantage of them. Knowing helps them to understand what would be considered inappropriate conduct if accosted by an adult.
Knowledge helps to give girls & women autonomy. Conservatives don't want that.
Duplicate due to technical issues.
I'm originally from Utah, and I actually grew up "LDS" (Mormon). My family member's are still strong believers. I consider myself agnostic now.
That being said, I think that parents should be given the perogative to introduce certain things to their kids.
This is the one book on the list by Judy Blume: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forever..._(novel)
I think it's reasonable not to have that book in a school library.
I'm completely open to questions or criticisms on my point of view.
I read the synopsis of the book(thanks for the link). I can see where a book like this wouldn't be appropriate for a 10yo but an entire school system ban seems an overreach.
It would be nice to ensure that as a parent, I was the one introducing topics to my child but having raised her already, I realize that unless I kept her at home her entire childhood, that's a pipe dream. I would have been ok with that book being at her school and if she had read it, she most likely would have talked to me about it as we had many candid conversations on sexuality, relationships and other topics that she came to be aware of via the internet, media or friends.
I'm not a parent, so you have that experiance where I don't. Are there any books, in your opinion, that shouldn't be in schools?
My parents have extremely strong point of view when it comes to sex: only when you're married, no porn, etc.
My argument is that it might make sense for a very religious state to protect their children with regards to their beliefs.
I agree with you that high schoolers could probably handle a book like that. But I don't think it's as far of an over-reach as your suggesting. A high schooler would have the ability to get it via their own means. (Go to the public library, or get it on kindle)
These fucking dorks
banning Margaret Atwood books lol
I mean, Project 2025 leads directly to Gilead so of course.