this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
93 points (97.0% liked)

Data is Beautiful

1165 readers
20 users here now

Be respectful

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago

Repubes are working hard to get those numbers up in the US

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The scale on the y axis, that's a logarithmic scale, is that right? The way it goes 0.1, 1,10

(I was good at maths but never kept it up after school, so not sure if this is the right terminology)

It'd be interesting to see the same data shown on a normal scale, because my initial reaction was to be slightly horrified that the day 1 figure didn't seem to have fallen much at all, only to then notice the scale.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You would not see anything on a linear scale except for the large values near day 1 and then it goes down to essentially 0.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Ah ok, thanks.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Chance of death approaches zero the older you get.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I know that this was probably a joke, but here is how the full curve looks like:

https://ourworldindata.org/how-do-the-risks-of-death-change-as-people-age

(As in the original post mind the logarithmic scale on y-axis)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

it appears that 12 year olds are invincible. this is probably why we are primed in our adolescence to take risks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Death rate per day: 10

per 1000 births

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

In Texas it's up

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This is because people are building safe and effective Orb structures in their own minds using safe geometrical code systems like GNU Octave or Lisp/Guile Scheme or Racket code.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I do wonder what's going on in those cases where it crosses back over the previous decade's line for a period (like 3mo for '71 and '61). The rest still looks better but what happened to the 3 month olds?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I would strongly guess the gap between 1941 to 1951 and (to a lesser extend to 1961) is due to the introduction of antibiotics.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Tried posting a screenshot of image one but sync won't let me.

Seems in 2022 there actually was a pretty noticeable increase in us infant deaths....

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Just a note that the article is for specifically England and Wales, and does not include the US.

It would be interesting to see average data from all countries with universal health care compared to the US though...

Also your image isn't loading :x