this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
76 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

34659 readers
671 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

X, the social media platform owned by Trump megadonor Elon Musk, is promoting Trump campaign-curated content to all U.S. users, regardless of whether they have opted out of Trump-related content.

On the platform formerly known as Twitter, banner ads for the Trump campaign donning the #Trump2024 tag appear for all U.S. users, even those who’ve blocked words, topics, and hashtags related to the candidate or his campaign or muted the advertiser.

Additionally, the #MAGA tag displays an edited image of the former president from his attempted assassination and the #Trump2024 hashtag displays an American flag.

It is unclear whether the Trump campaign paid for the images on the #Trump2024 and #MAGA tags, though an advertisement for the tag on the site’s trending page reads “Promoted by Team Trump.” As Mashable noted, it is the first time the platform has enabled the image feature to promote a specific political candidate.

Clicking the Trump2024 tag also prompts American flag graphics to flood the screen.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 68 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Honestly? If you’re still on Twitter at this point, that’s on you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But I need it for my ________. There are simply no alternatives.

That's what they say.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I totally get the sentiment... But there are people that I can't get anywhere else.. mostly my local police, fire department, and local govt are only on xitter... Also heavily use for the national weather service, but if drumpy wins that will be going away.

The last couple days I've been investigating if any of those are on threads, so I can try find a way to follow them mastodon... But doubt they have their accounts enabled for the fediverse... But I'd also have to migrate my mastodon account to an instance that hasn't de-federated threads...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

mostly my local police, fire department, and local govt are only on xitter

The thing is, they are there because the users are there. After all, they want to reach the most people with their important official messaging.

You have to leave to make them leave.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm willing to bet that Elon donated the money to be kicked back to Twitter in order to fraudulently make it look like revenue was improving.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

Damn that's so obvious too. Like their whole best seller book scam. You're probably right.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

This is SOP in silicon valley so I'm sure you're correct.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 months ago

Maybe it's time to stop drinking at the nazi bar.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you still have a Twitter account, you are a piece of shit. That goes for everyone of you

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Most of the world doesn’t know or care about US politics. X is a hellish platform though that does crack on pro-Palestinian users.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I can hear the internal justifications of the “journalists” still using the platform.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What platform are journalists supposed to be using when almost all of them seem to be biased?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Any platform that doesn’t openly advertise (and have an owner who openly donates to the campaign of) one particular candidate. I would not expect to find any self respecting journalist to have an account on Truth Social for instance. Being on either platform directly contributes to the election campaign of Donald Trump.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Which platform would that be? I am not trying to be difficult, but I think probably all platforms are heavily biased.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Does this represent a taxable benefit for Trump’s campaign?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

There is a point in every cult where the leader increases restrictions and demands purity. What this does is eliminate the free thinking people by forcing them to chose. The more you impose these restrictions the crazier they get targeting only the most devote and the most codependent people.

What you end up with is an army of sycophants that will die before they leave the cult. Twitter will be the largest imposition of this strategy on a targeted group of people that i can think of. It's time to start being afraid of the cult of elon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

It’s time to start being afraid of the cult of elon.

He's said he's going to donate $45m per month to Trump until November. It's becoming very clear he bought out Twitter to suppress free communication of people.

He sees which way the wind is blowing and is hoping he can help install Dictator-for-a-day Trump who'll deregulate every industry and cut every tax that might apply to him.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Isn't that illegal in some way?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I want to transfer my tweets to my Mastodon before deleting my Twitter account.

I don't understand why a tool like still doesn't exist.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

IMO, that tool probably doesn't exists mainly because it'd be a thankless pain in the ass.

In general, unless you're self-hosting Mastodon, you probably mean "my Mastodon account on someone's server". And that "someone's server" probably has some moderation rules which differ significantly from Twitter. So, re-posting a bunch of tweets (i.e. "transferring") to someone's server can get hairy. Maybe some or all of your past stuff isn't copacetic with the new server - but who wants to re-litigate a sudden influx of old posts?

So, IMO, whoever writes (or uses) a tool to copy over a bunch of Twitter posts to any arbitrary Mastodon server is probably going to get yelled at a lot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You can already export your Twitter/X data.

You can already transer data between mastodon accounts.

Why not import data to Mastodon from Twitter/X using the same past dates?

Pixelfed already does it with Instagram as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Just write a blog, if your brain defecations are interesting enough, people will find them. Sheesh.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Lets all remember the following tweet by Elon

Guys you are all too left, calm down a bit please.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The USA doesn't even have a left in any meaningful way. There are two parties, one is right and the other is far right.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

As someone from a not-US country, I'm always amazed at how right wing the US "liberal" policies are. If Biden was our PM he'd be more right wing than our most recent conservative PM.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

My country 's right wing government, with actual full blown fascists in the parliament, is more leftist than Biden...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Yeah. Americans are brain washed. It’s a fact at this point imo.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

You know what? I'm gonna left even harder.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (8 children)

This is true though. 1992 Bill Clinton would be a republican today. Biden supported a 1994 crime bill that is considered racist today. Obama didn't support gay marriage in 2008. Now liberals are fighting for sex change treatments for children. People 30 years ago would consider such an idea a grotesque absurdity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Biden supported a 1994 crime bill that is considered racist today.

Some context is required there, though. The 1994 crime bill did have significant support among Black leaders and activists. It was seen as an imperfect solution to a critical issue that disproportionately affected Black neighborhoods at the time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Most republicans prior to Reagan are more like today’s liberals. They did things like make national parks, codify civil rights, and invest in social programs. Today’s liberals are trying to do what those republicans did - save natural lands, implement social programs, and enhance rights for people.

That said, just because a liberal does some things a conservative might approve of doesn’t make them a Republican, nor would the inverse be true.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Conservatism is dead. Climate change is scientifically proven to be catastrophic.

If we do nothing, change will come to us, and fuck up everything. If we elect to change our society and systems, we save ourselves but our way of living changes.

One way or another there's change. There's nothing to conserve. Stop yelling and kicking like an irrational kid trying to save conservatism and crony capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

leftist here, I'm fighting against sex changes for children (specifically intersex infants)

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

That doesn't surprise me. The left and right paradigm flattens a ton of complexity into a boolean spectrum when the reality is far more complex than that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It is true. And that's OK. Failure to change with the times and to learn from scientific advancements and social improvements is a conservative trait.

You are accurate, but it begs the question: Is not changing your opinions with time and new info a respectable way to live your life? Will you be on the right side of history? Who knows? But I feel like giving people more options is more often better than the alternative.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Failure to change with the times and to learn from scientific advancements and social improvements is a conservative trait.

Literally lolled at this. This post is in response to a "far right" Elon Musk who owns the first company to ever fire a rocket into space, retrieve and reuse it. I'm sure he's just taking credit for all the bleeding heart liberal geniuses working under him.

Is not changing your opinions with time and new info a respectable way to live your life?

🥱 Wow way to load your rebuttal to make yourself seem so erudite and above it all. The reality is that a ton of the "new info" turns out to be proven false or even to be outright lies. The reality is that you should be incredibly suspicious of "new info" because chances are it hasn't been properly vetted and could be driven by an agenda similar to how companies fund research to prove their desired conclusions.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hey I was trying to say your point was valid but I guess you'd rather be told to go fuck yourself? /shrug

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

Be honest. You were shitting on conservatives not agreeing with me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

maybe we should all ask our ancestors what they think about our society. you know 80 years ago people wouldn't be so keen on integration so much, maybe we should give this whole "having black people freely move around" a second thought, what do you think?

also you're massively misunderstanding the whole political spectrum but i don't have the energy. I'll just suffice to say liberals are not and have never been left wing. left has gained some traction in recent years but that's not about liberals. also for every inch the democrats have moved to the left, republicans have moved a mile to the right. the Overton window has shifted, but not to the left overall.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Ah remember the days when you could be left and still donate to an immigrant hating, sexist and racist billionaire? Those were the good days.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

Thanks for proving my point

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

1992 Bill Clinton thought that we should have universal single-payer healthcare. In 2016 Hillary said that would "never, ever, ever happen."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

If you look at Hillary's broader statements, she has always favored universal single-payer healthcare. She worked her ass off to get a plan passed in 1994, and she was relentlessly attacked for it.

The last time Democrats got successful movement on healthcare was March 2010 with a filibuster proof Democratic majority in the Senate, a majority in the House, and a popular new president in the White House. Even then, only a relatively tepid compromise bill was passed, with even the "public option" stripped out (thanks Joe Lieberman).

Will conditions change in the future? Quite possibly, especially as our health care becomes increasingly unaffordable. Maybe it's not so helpful to have senior politicians telling voters something is impossible and potentially affecting the Overton Window. But Hillary's warning, that Bernie Sanders' plan hadn't a chance of getting passed, was a good reality check.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Maybe this will make people finally stop using the site for good. But I doubt it.

Who wants to see a child rapist every time you go to their site?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How to get every business to leave your platform in one simple step.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Idk I thought they would have already left a long time ago but they are still there

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

I'm surprised Twitter is still running. How many engineers do they have?

Maybe those engineers should go rogue and just.. not do this. But no, probably the ones left are jerks who support this, or people with visa worries.

Maybe someone will push Musk in front of a bus though.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

I'd say this is a great time for even more advertisers to abandon that platform, but really anyone who would care about this should have left a long time ago.

load more comments
view more: next ›