this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
61 points (84.3% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

712 readers
162 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

"According to the post on SPD’s Blotter blog, officers responded to a car prowl report involving a man “potentially armed with a knife” arrived at the garage, “found this male unconscious” and rendered aid until medics responded and took him to Harborview hospital, where he died two days later.

Upon further investigation, the report continues, officers “determined the owner of the vehicle interrupted the car prowl and confronted the male, and they got into a physical altercation. During the altercation, the man fell unconscious, and the vehicle owner separated from him.”

...a photo show(s) the tools the man had with him... they include a credit card, screwdrivers, a crowbar, and a small hatchet."

"He was choked to death, by the still-unnamed owner of the vehicle he was allegedly breaking into."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

this is kind of his fault for breaking and entering. Aside from police turning a blind eye... I don't see why someone wouldn't defend themselves from armed robbery.

" Heriford, who was 35 when he died, was relatively well known to Seattle police, who sometimes encountered him when doing “crime prevention efforts” at the encampment under I-5 in Northeast Seattle where he lived, according to one police report. Between October 2022, when court documents show SPD officers first arrested him for an attempted break-in, and his death this year, Heriford was was charged in at least five theft or attempted theft cases, most of those in the garages of apartment buildings like the one where he died. The items Heriford was accused of included suitcases, paddleboards, motorcycles, and cars.

He pled guilty to a domestic violence assault charge in 2009 and was charged with violating a no-contact order in that case several times between 2010 and 2012, but court records indicate he was never charged with another violent crime.

"

So we're trying to hitch our wagon to a violent thief just because they died in a failed armed robbery attempt?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

He was known for breaking and entering, but the murderer was not being attacked and nobody's car had been broken into according to the article.

It seems to me everyone is willing to dismiss a murderer because the person who was murdered is an "undesirable".

Edit: it seems like people support preemptive murder ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Most people on the internet are emotionally little kids who fantasize about ending the lives of people who "deserve it". They have little understanding of how most things in the world actually work.

When life puts them in a position they think they are righteous and justified, they can be capable of unimaginable cruelty. While seeing themselves as the "good guy" the whole time. I've seen it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Yup, it's the old "He was no angel" trope. Lots of people think it's OK to kill non-angels.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

How do you how he wasn't being attacked? I am definitely not condoning strangling someone to death but we don't know what happened.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

From the article:

“determined the owner of the vehicle interrupted the car prowl and confronted the male, and they got into a physical altercation. During the altercation, the man fell unconscious, and the vehicle owner separated from him.”

The murderer interrupted the man who he presumed was prowling and choked him to death.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"Hey! Are you trying to break into my car? Stop!"

"Don't tell me to stop! I'll fucking kill you man! I'm going to fucking kill you!"

Just one of a million different scenarios where confronting a person breaking into cars might turn into that person turning violent and trying to kill the one confronting them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Still doesn't make it okay to kill them, which is contrary to the feeling of the comment thread of this post.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

How to spin any story the way you want, perfect example.