Amazing how the NSA finds every excise to suck possible.
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
146 points (97.4% liked)
Technology
59039 readers
3763 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Redaction means it’s still classified for some reason. Makes me wonder what they think might still be sensitive on a 40+ year old lecture like this, when DOJ guidelines call for automatic declassification of “records having permanent historical value” after only 25 years unless they fall into a handful of very specific categories, like divulging the identity of an active agent.
The simple/charitable explanation might be that they don't necessarily expect there to be anything that still needs to be redacted, but they won't release it until they're sure.
Basically, the recording is in an obscure video format. People at the NSA can’t easily watch it, so they can’t redact it.
Have they never heard about VLC?
VLC can play analog tape?
If you somehow transfer the raw bits it probably can 😄
I had to check -
AMPEX 1-inch open reel tapes
This is a terrible excuse, as can be found by a simple web search that shows sites like this, which is a fantastic site btw.
I’m sure the NSA doesn’t want to transfer a recording that might contain elements they still want to redact to any old outside firm, especially not one outside the U.S. as is your example. In the end I suspect this probably isn’t the only 1-inch open reel tape they would want to transfer to newer media. They would probably want to either bring a unit in-house or go to a facility where they can thoroughly vet the equipment and staff and basically take control for the duration of the project.
Yeah that's my point really, saying they can't easily watch it is a cop out because it's easy to find ways to make it possible. Which includes facilities and equipment such as in my example, but there's plenty in the US and I'd be surprised if they don't have their own facility they can hire the equipment into.
The thing that got my interest is the terms used themselves. Why say it's an old format, rather than or as well as what the format actually is?
The media used, which I quoted, is not unusual itself but it is unusual to be used for a video format. Cinema film is usually 35 or 70mm gauge, and stereo audio is usually half or quarter inch. One inch is more commonly used for multi-track audio recording.
Maybe that's all there is to it, there being no playback device, but its all rather intriguing, and it feels like there's more they aren't saying.
I demand details, goddamn it!
VLC can probably play DNAs