this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
175 points (91.5% liked)

Coffee

8390 readers
1 users here now

☕ - The hot beverage that powers the world!

Coffee gadgets - It's always great to learn about new gadgets. Please share your favorite hardware or full setups. It might inspire newcomers to experiment!

Local businesses - Please promote your local businesses. If you are not the owner of the business you are promoting, kindly ask the owner if it's okay. It would be great if the business has a physical store to include an exterior or interior shot.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Best lightweight coffee maker. The rubber goes after a time but you can buy replacements

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

I've kept the rubber plunger out of the tube when in storage. When kept inside the tube it compresses the rubber and retains the shape memory which causes it to fail. Haven't ever replaced mine and it is eight years old. Still works perfectly.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

My original one i had to do this but the one i have now, if you fully depress the plunger with no coffee in it it comes out the bottom just enough to not squeeze the sides.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Really? I have mine since probably 6 or 7 years and it's still fine and I use it several times a week.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I’ve found you can extend the life of the plunger by placing the plunger rubber-side down on a table or counter top, tilting it slightly onto the edge of the rubber and then rotating it. This essentially presses the rubber and extends it outwards and seems to help achieve the seal you expect. I’ve been doing it for a while now and it’s worked well for me.

I’m sure it won’t last forever but it’s something worth trying to get a bit more life out of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I have one that's about eleven years old now. Still works perfectly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Coffee oils keep rubber moist 👍

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

For all of us Aeropress junkies, here's a deep rabbit hole: https://aeroprecipe.com/. I hope y'all have as much fun as I did playing around with the recipes and results options.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Well. Didn't know that existed. Thanks!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Is that plastic? Gonna be a hard no for me Dawg

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (3 children)

They're working on a glass-and-metal premium version. But it'll cost a premium price, though.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

$40 is already a premium price for what it is. It makes great coffee, but at the end of the day it's a sturdy plastic plunger. Probably $4 landed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's made in US, so it should be not as cheap as Chinese stuff.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

I know it is, but production is almost completely hands off for something like this and plastic is cheap as dirt. US production runs wouldn't be very expensive either. It's a painfully simple product. You get like 5 pieces of plastic in a small box. You can find things that look more complicated at the dollar store.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That would be amazing. The device is cool, and seemed to work well from the reviews, but the plastic prevented me from buying it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It's made of polypropylene, partially recycled, extremely durable, and again fully recyclable if it does reach end of life at some point. It's also certified BPA free - as opposed to the very first version (that was transparent and used a different plastic). BPA doesn't leech into water unless exposed over a very long time anyway, and the average brew time is about 3-5 minutes; but it's good they made the change anyway. If I remember correctly, BPA became an issue mostly due to being in baby toys that are chewed on, or bottles for beverages with a very long shelf life (e.g. water, that practically lasts forever) where it can leech out over time.

To me it's the ideal travel brewer, since I can pre-grind my coffee and keep it in a tin box, where I can also put a stack of filter papers in to keep them from getting wet. Glass just wouldn't work on the road, the risk of damage is simply too high. And you'll anyway need to have a plastic plunger, or at the very least a plastic coated one, since you need to have a 100% tight seal.

At home I don't use it often since I have a decent espresso machine, but I can see the merit as a daily driver in a small kitchen.

Edit: Oh btw, if the body was made of glass, I can totally see how it would shatter someday while applying force. You have to push with quite a bit of power the water through.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Questions: what are the perks to using this vs a pour over system (which is what I currently use when I'm out of cold brew)? Is this easy to use if you have limited hand dexterity and strength?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

The effect on extraction by the slight pressurization (and ability to change the pressure by how hard you press) and speed of use would be two advantages over pour over.

It doesn't require hand dexterity or, really, hand strength. Arguably a proper, well-made pour-over with a goose neck kettle takes more hand dexterity than an Aeropress. Basically you put the hot water in, wait, and then press the plunger. Body weight or mild strength is all it takes. I usually just put my hands on top and then lean with my body; that functionally makes it require no hand strength at all.

They're very affordable, so perhaps worth trying. Unless you are concerned about microplastics. The entire thing is plastic.

Edit: they have a newer, more expensive version made of Tritan crystal. I know nothing about the composition of Tritan crystal and whether there is anything that can leech or whatever from it, but I would assume it gets rid of the microplastic concern. Though I'm not sure what the "rubber" stopper is made from.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Triton is a trade named plastic. All the microplastic concerns would still be there, but because it's based frre, food safe, and can be made clear, it allows "funner" colored food safe plastics to be used.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Honestly I'd rather use plastic than have to press my hand down on heated glass. It's bound to explode one day and send glass down your wrist.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Aeropress is more forgiving and produces more body. Pour over, being a percolation brew, will have higher extraction at the cost of being a bit more sensitive to technique.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I love the Aeropress. I don't know if I've ever been able to make a bad cup with it. It seems so forgiving, yet you can really dial in a recipe at the same time.

My baseline recipe is 20g of coffee ground on the Encore (18 for light, 16 for med, 10 for espresso) and 200 ml water just off boil. Mix inverted for 2 min, stirring 3 or 4 times. Add 150 ml hot water in cold weather or right from the tap in hot water.

The only other brewer I bother with now is the OXO pour over, which is a good hands off brewer that makes me a very satisfying and consistent cup without the involvement of the Aeropress. It makes what it makes though. I use the same 20g coffee ground at 16-18, unbleached filters, and all 350 ml of water at once. I typically get evenly brewed grounds, but if I'm feeling so inclined I'll check it's getting all the coffee evenly, but whether I touch it or not, I feel I get the same result, so it's more piece of mind than taste that is affected.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Nice I need to try adding the extra water next time. I have a bad habit of brewing and walking away too long before I push the plunger.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

I typically steep it 1.5-2 minutes, the gf likes it from 2-5 min, James's testing I think was good up to 10 minutes without too much difference, and even in the Aeropress instructions I think it calls for like 30 seconds. I still feel all produce something drinkable.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I had used one for many years, it's great for small amounts of coffee. If you need to make coffee for your significant other as well, it's a pain. Recently moved back to a French press and I love it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That is indeed a drawback this has. On the other hand I don't think a larger aeropress would make much sense either. This size is just perfect, but definitely for one cup.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I like to brew on a mocha pot, pour into my aeropress, and plunge into a cup. It filters the sediment out for a super clean taste.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

I use an aeropress filter in my moka pot. Best cup of coffee without the sediment

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I wonder how this would affect my Turkish coffee. I think a lot of it's texture and flavor is because a lot of the powder is kind of dissolved filtering it out might be a bad idea.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

I tried it with Turkish coffee. IMHO, it ruined it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

I've had the aeropress since the month they came out, and I absolutely love it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's a great backup to have, that's for sure. I drink mostly cold brew, but sometimes I run out and there are a few days before I brew more. Aeropress is a fantastic way to brew a quick cup.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

Scientists found a way to make cold brew in a few hours just recently. It even passed every blind taste test, too. I forget the machine name, but it's also commonly used to clean jewelry, as well as use in a lab, for like $60.

Edit: I went and found the old article, they used ultrasonic waves and it only took them 1-3 minutes depending on preference. Unfortunately after reading another article, it's a modification they made to existing espresso machines. Their initial machine was around £15,000, and was overkill. Not sure how someone would be able to replicate at home. 🥲

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Ultrasonic cleaner? It basically vibrates like a speaker at high frequency, and when in water it can be used to clean jewelry.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

If you find it, post it!

It's not really an inconvenience for me; I set it up, let it brew overnight; easy-peasy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Ultrasound? I have one of those I use to clean all sorts of things. Never thought of using one for coffee, but I could see it really rendering the oils, even cold.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Using the inversion method too, most excellent.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I used to do inversion, but was swayed by James Hoffman's taste experiments and concluding method.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There's no real reason to do it that way, but it's just kinda fun.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (3 children)

It's the risk of knocking it over and making a huge fucking mess, it's thrilling.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

The hand burning when I splash some boiling water through the holes for the cap wakes me up faster than the coffee when it happens! 😅

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

A bit of risk/reward there, can't do this method anymore since my cat has toppled it more than once. At least with the plunger in approach I have maybe a second or two to stop a mess from happening...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It seems popular. I am set for coffee gear at this time. Very happy with the V60 02 and the Clever Dripper.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

What's your recipe right now?

Nice picture btw.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Seems very much personal taste, that spans a wide range these days.

On suggestions from YouTube I tried 20+g coarse with low volume and temperature based on competition winning recipes and hated it. No body, thin and unsatisfying.

So I'm back to 12-15g medium, inverted, add some 90-95C water and stir out the fizz, then up to 180g water or so. Heavy repeated agitation early on, after maybe 60s uninvert for a gentle plunge. Usually dilute a little with some cold, drink black.

I checked the brew temp and full boil gives 96C in the press. I often do 200F 93C on the kettle for about 90 in the press. Sometimes I just boil and add a splash of cold.

My beans are medium roast - city+, no oiliness. I like pretty trad rich coffee and hate thin acidic tea like brews. Tea makes better tea than coffee does IMO. But I also hate acrid flat bitterness of dark roasts.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

People need to stop doing inversions. At some point you are going to spill it and now we have good valve based options its not even necessary to stop the tiny amount of dripping that occurs. Even before we had the several valve solutions the amount that actually dripped through was tiny and had no impact on the flavour of the cup of coffee since you could put the plunger in and create a slight negative pressure that kept the liquid in.

James Hoffman taste tested this and couldn't tell the difference, he has a fantastic video on what is actually worth doing and what isn't with the Aeropress and inversion isn't.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (4 children)

So what's the benefit of an aero press over a French press? I've used the French press for years and I always see people loving aero press. I'm curious what the differences are.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Main difference is the fact that the aeropress uses a paper filter which filters out sediment and oils giving the coffee a "cleaner" taste. From my research before I bought it, I remember it also being slightly healthier because, again, you filter out those oils.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›