this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
99 points (99.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35903 readers
1495 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Thinking about the gaming magazines I used to read as a kid in the '90s. Some of them have found their way online thanks to preservationist efforts, but most are seemingly gone forever. (I'm talking about the particular magazine I read as a kid, many others have complete or near-complete collections available online in the form of scanned hardcopies.)

Do the publishing houses keep a digital copy of every magazine they release? If so, why don't they release them? They could probably charge a fee to download them, like other digital magazines do, but of course it'd be great if they just shared them for free for historical purposes on the Internet Archive or something.

It would be an insanely short-sighted practice to not keep masters of these publications forever, no? πŸ€” The raw files probably take up a few CDs' worth of space for the entire run of the magazine. Big assumptions on my part, I have no clue how any of it is done!

So:

  1. Do they retain the files forever?
  2. If so, why might they not be shared 20 or 30 years later?

Cheers!

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 64 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I think the bigger problem is when a publisher goes out of business, is there anyone left who cares enough to save the archives?

If lucky, there will be an acquiring publisher who cares enough to fold the archives into their own.

Otherwise it’s dependent on the outgoing editor in chief or some other individual to save that stuff and keep in in their garage until one day they die and their heirs send it to the dump.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Which is why archive.org is so important. Many of the earliest films have been lost to time. Now Nintendo is trying to shut down rom sites and websitea hosting pdf's of their game manuals, and yes, Nintendo Power.

So far they've been sucsessful, except for archive.org, who has an exemption. That exemption lasts for a few years, and every few years it needs to be voted on to KEEP that exemption.

I don't trust our government to always do the right thing. So over the next few weeks, I'm hoard downloading. Instead of downloading 1 or 2 roms at a time, for games I recently discovered, I'm just downloading entire rom sets. Fuck you Nintendo. Instead of downloading a few dozen roms, I'm now downloading your entire catalog, and making backups once I have everything. And sorry Sony, but Nintendo roped you into this. And microsodt? Oh, you're safe. I don't give a shit about xbox....

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

How does the archive.org exemption work? When is it voted on next?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

NGL I kinda want to look into OG Xbox emulation, been waxing nostalgia for Fable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Last I was playing around with it (about 2 years ago) there were at least 20 stable games running, even 360 ones

[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 months ago

NASA literally threw out the original video recordings from the moon landings when the office where they were stashed got moved

[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Most commercial publications in the USA and UK -- UPC/ISBN or not, regular or not -- will often send copies of their work to the national library (ie Library of Congress). That said, those copies might not be prioritized for digital viewing. So seeing them in-person might be the only way to access them.

As for whether the publishing houses keep them, it's probably very individualized, so who can say.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago

Perhaps worth noting, there was a SCOTUS decision in the early 2000s (New York Times Co. v. Tasini) that held that freelance journalists whose contracts did not specifically include an electronic distribution clause were entitled to damages when those articles were subsequently released on the web and to electronic news services like Lexis/Nexis.

Big publications like the NYT came to settlements that allowed them to pay to redistribute the older articles (by paying the original authors), but smaller publications may not have such a settlement structure in place and may not be allowed to redistribute the original articles without additional permissions.

FYI, I have a copy of the Dragon Magazine Archive CD-ROM version that came out in 2001... only to immediately disappear off the market for this very reason!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

So much missed potential to train LLMs on 90s Teen Bop.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

Archived versions of the final publications are often saved by libraries and such, as others have pointed out.

As for the source files that went into production...that is a more complicated set of issues. The business may have gone into receivership and the legality of who owns what gets messy. You'll need legit software licenses to use those files and many other details. If the publication ran ads, that could potentially be a factor, too.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Hoping to hear an answer to this.

As someone who saved literal cases of gaming mags from the 90s-00s I'm ready to part with them hoping someone else will go through the effort to scan them and make them available. I just don't have the time or resources for that project and I've got a storage unit FULL of gaming gear that I need to empty. It's hard enough to go through the games and hardware, I just want to get rid of the boxes and boxes ofabysls and magazines but I don't want to trash them.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Further, a lot of that old media tied up in proprietary formats that simply don't exist anymore.

Fuck, half the equipment I used in local television news broadcasting 20 years ago is all up in smoke. Media from that time is on tapes that probably don't have easily findable tape decks to play them.

I would suspect its similar happens in print media.

In fact, I know it happens in print media because Adobe PageMaker was big for a long time. I used it to build and format my high schools newspaper when I was in my senior year. I was the layout editor because I was the only one who knew how to halfway use it.

Adobe InDesign was the successor to PageMaker and... for a while... you could convert PageMaker documents to InDesign documents, but they dropped that support years ago.

So you want an old Adobe PageMaker file from the 90's to recreate lost information from then?

Well you better figure out how to pirate both an old copy of Windows and the final version of Adobe PageMaker just to be able to fucking run it in a virtual machine or something. Adobe is fucking ruthless when it comes to copy protection.

End result: Why would a business hold on to documents it functionally cannot use because the proprietary program or hardware used to "read" it no longer functionally exists? They simply won't the cost of keep useless documents around is too high.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

...you better figure out how to pirate both an old copy of Windows and the final version of Adobe Pacemaker...

Don't you threaten me with a good time! Finding a Windows copy is the easy part, even if it's debatable how safe the copy is. Pagemaker sounds like the hard part.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Thinking about the gaming magazines I used to read as a kid in the '90s.

I remember those fondly.

It would be an insanely short-sighted practice to not keep masters of these publications forever, no?

You're talking about capitalist organisations here... there's nothing about them that isn't short-sighted.

The raw files probably take up a few CDs’ worth of space for the entire run of the magazine.

Nope... just one cover page probably takes something around 300mbs at a minimum and could be a whole lot larger depending on the quality of the imagery used (if I remember my time in the printing/publishing industry correctly) Storage of already printed material in those days was always an afterthought.

Do they retain the files forever?

Highly unlikely - a lot of the storage just got dumped at one point or the other since there was really little reason (profit wise) to return to anything at all. There might still be an old Mac sitting around somebody's garage or backyard which still contains the stuff, but I won't be holding any hope out for that. There's always the chance that some employee still has the disks somewhere (you'd be amazed at how necessary it could be have proof that you actually did work somewhere and actually did work on this or that specific thing - the bosses were notoriously petty), and I suspect that's how a lot of stuff ends up on places like archive.org.

The corporates themselves don't give a shit - as soon as the profits roll in, it's all expendable as far as the overpaid geniuses in the fancy offices are concerned.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

I know the Finnish National Library acquires and files a copy of every newspaper or magazine issue released in Finland, and many Finnish language ones released outside Finland. Other countries probably have something similar.