760
AI layoffs (sopuli.xyz)
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 95 points 3 months ago
[-] [email protected] 84 points 3 months ago

Shareholders: why not all three?

[-] [email protected] 38 points 3 months ago

Hedge fund manager: hold my beer.

[-] [email protected] 36 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Humanity: yes, let's replace all of the above. 100% unemployment rate is the only way to go.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Honestly 100% unemployed becuase we have a good universal income system or something would be great. But sadly it looks like we're in a different timeline :(

[-] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

*Several steps later*

Narrator: And that, folks, is how we got the Utopia we live in, by replacing all the work with AI, and letting people enjoy their lives

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Haha. No. Nothing so hopeful. The rich people will get even richer and everyone that used to be working class and middle class die a slow death.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Now I wander what would happen if only rich people would survive and I'm sure somebody has already written an sf book about that

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Yeah. That's (arguably) the background scenario to Asimov's book "The Naked Sun" https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Naked_Sun

[-] [email protected] 35 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Considering that C-suite executives are usually fantastically expensive, they'd be a logical position to automate (assuming AI worked like suits think it does). For some veeeery strange reason no board of directors has suggested replacing themselves with AIs

[-] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago

It’d be super easy to replace Sam Altman with a bot that spits out keywords known to increase OpenAI shares.

Waitaminute… Sam alt-man?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I know, right? It's like he's an incredibly shitty sci-fi villain.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

CEO is the first role to go!

[-] [email protected] 51 points 3 months ago

given that LLMs and gen AIs are great at talking bullshit and creating presentations, one is a more realistic expectation than the other

[-] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

I'll believe AI can replace engineers when I see NVIDIA firing them. But like the graphic says, the manager's job seems a lot easier to replace instead.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 3 months ago

Managers might not like people but they don't want to get rid of them. There's no cheap thrill from micromanaging an AI.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

100,000% this - money or even utility seems to not be everything, compared to feeling self-importance

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Plus it's harder to pass the buck and blame an AI for your screw ups. It would be perceived, as the kids say, as a skills issue.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago
[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Yes. In big established companies they are managing managers.

In smaller companies, no

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

In bigger company's C levels manage VPs who manage directors who manage managers

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Depends on the size of the company.

[-] [email protected] 32 points 3 months ago

Owners: with AI we can finally get rid of everyone

[-] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago

If we fire all developers and allow AIs to program themselves, the AIs are going to commit virtual seppuku after a few days.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Can we build an AI manager that just keeps asking for different shades of red?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

AIs are going to commit virtual seppuku after a few days.

Yes. And that's our best case scenario. Worst case is a wildly incompetent, but still effective form of SkyNet.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago

It's the marketing department that should really be worried.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Like the C level isn't the marketing department

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

And to be fair, like always, good marketing is genius stuff.

But it also feels rare. I suspect precisely because C-suite and upper management love to mess with it, so the rote marketing approach gets normalized, which in turn drives all the decent marketing people away.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Only one of them gets to make the decision to fire the other

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Could probably replace managers with AI, but being trained on most managers would mean it would be equally bad at its job.

I think the most likely is for the artists jobs to go away as art doesn't have to be exact, but code does.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Maybe the central problem is racing to put other people out of work period, regardless of who they are. Maybe putting people out of work is not a net benefit for society, it's actually negative in the long run, and only truly a benefit for shareholders. They don't need any more of those at the expense of the working class.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Ideally, nobody should have to work.

The problem is that labor-saving technology is never permitted to save labor. We make those displaced laborers go do other shit.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

It should be a net benefit for society. Any system in which it isn't is a very flawed system. Like most of the world right now.

this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
760 points (98.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

32024 readers
446 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS