201
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Sound familiar?


Vivek Ramaswamy is trying to use his presidential campaign as an excuse to wiggle out of legal proceedings against him.

Ramaswamy was a board member of both Roivant Sciences, which he founded in 2014, and Sumitovant Biopharma until earlier this year. Sumitovant successfully negotiated to acquire Roivant subsidiary Myovant in October 2022. Under the deal, which was completed in March, Sumitovant agreed to pay $27 per share for all outstanding Myovant shares.

But soon after, the investment management firm Alpine Partners, a now-former Myovant shareholder, launched an appraisal rights lawsuit to determine that it and other shareholders had been fairly compensated for their stock. Alpine requested that Ramaswamy testify and provide materials about “how Sumitovant valued Myovant at the time of the merger and the negotiating process that led to the merger.” Alpine’s subpoena set Ramaswamy’s testimony for June 30; the filing also gave him a 30-day grace period to comply.

Ramaswamy responded on July 27, saying that he couldn’t possibly testify because he is too busy running for president.

“As a candidate for President of the United States, I must frequently travel across the United States to campaign, make speeches, give media interviews, and meet with voters,” he said in a court filing. “Consequently, I am often away from home, and when I am home it is often not until late in the evening after a full campaign day.”

“The subpoena request and resulting discovery would therefore constitute an undue burden and will materially affect my ability to run for higher office.”

Ramaswamy also insisted that he does not have “any material knowledge of the transaction that is the basis of the underlying Appraisal Proceeding.”

The judge has yet to rule on Ramaswamy’s motion. But Ramaswamy clearly thinks that he is above the law now that he is running for president.

Ramaswamy isn’t the only person using his campaign to avoid legal trouble. It seems he has taken the cue from Donald Trump, who is facing a mountain of lawsuits. He has repeatedly tried to set trial dates for well after the election, hoping that he will win and thus be immune from multiple cases.

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

“As a candidate for President of the United States, I must frequently travel across the United States to campaign, make speeches, give media interviews, and meet with voters,” he said in a court filing. “Consequently, I am often away from home, and when I am home it is often not until late in the evening after a full campaign day.”

“The subpoena request and resulting discovery would therefore constitute an undue burden and will materially affect my ability to run for higher office.”

So... you have a day job? Wow. How completely unique. No one else before the court has a day job that takes up a lot of their time.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Also... You chose to run for office, you didn't have to.

[-] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago

That is the worst excuse I've ever heard! "Yeah, sorry I can't come to my own hearing, I'm busy" Give me a fucking break.

There are two sets of rules in this country, one for the rich and one for everyone else.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Watch Trump try to do the same thing.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

„I am too busy being rich and important.“

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

GOP it seems had become a platform for career criminals to escape prosecution.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

How anyone looks at this greasy used car salesman, and thinks his dumb Libertarian ideas and shrill whiny vibes are going to solve all their problems....

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Not even in office, just trying, and he thinks that's enough. Hope the judge throws the fucking book at him, it's a little late to nip this kind of behavior in the bud but at least don't reward it.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Sounds familiar… 🤔

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Running for Vice President sooo hard

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Hey Vivek,

Why do you hate so open
And keep your motives vague?

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Good to know, but can we... Not talk about it? Courts will do their thing, and the last think I want is another guy that can pretend that normal charges are a witch hunt because 'the left' is coming for him.

Best we can do here is ignore it and let it solve itself imo.

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
201 points (98.6% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3458 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS