140
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Archived copy

One of the protesters, university student Matilda Lane-Rose, held a press conference outside WA’s state parliament two days after she was arrested, where she defended her action outside O’Neill’s home as peaceful and slammed Woodside’s gas projects as a disaster for the climate and indigenous heritage.

“In terms of her feeling threatened, I’d just like it to be known that there were over a dozen counter-terrorist police officers camped both inside and outside her property overnight,” she said.

“So I think that she was very, very protected on Tuesday, and there was no threat whatsoever posed by me, a 19-year-old carrying a bike lock.”

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago

I’m against protests outside private residences, but given the context, the fact that her home was surrounded by a dozen riot police inside and outside the property, and there is only one teenage girl with a bike protesting, speaks volumes about how our society favors the privileged few over the needs of the many.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

do their policies end at their workplace? at our work? even outside of our residence? no. so why are they allowed in my home but I can't show up to theirs?

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

― John F. Kennedy

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

The orders, which were sought by O'Neill, include a condition that the campaigners may not “make any reference to person protected by any electronic means.”

And another voice is silenced while the planet litterally burns.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Congratulations, I can now put a name and a face to the Woodside climate criminals.

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
140 points (99.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5052 readers
454 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS