this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
340 points (90.9% liked)

Political Memes

5434 readers
3102 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 35 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That's not hard to swallow. It's shoved down our throats daily.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Isn’t every single nation known to man making decisions that best serve themselves?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Norway puts all its oil money into a national trust it uses to improve the quality of life for its citizens like provide free education. The US government says its illegal to cancel student debt.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

But the post is about foreign policy not internal policy

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

I think I told someone the other day that nobody was suggesting liberals supported imperialist activities on the basis of their liberal ideology

I think I owe that person an apology

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Sure, but the US starts and supports a lot more wars than any other country and wastes as many tax dollars on it as the next ten countries combined, so it's fair to single them out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

but picking on the new guy is so easy.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago

Go ahead and try, China and Russia combined can't do it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

very easily swallows the pill, as this has been known for decades and is the same literally everywhere

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

We can't help but involve ourselves in international atrocities. What are we supposed to do when they obviously benefit our capitalistic interests??

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Wait, was that different in any point in time?

Basically all wars start (and end) out of economic interests (which come in a wide variety, eg land, easier enforced economic policies over another country, colonialism with military bases, or even just pain old money spent on war industry).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Basically all wars start (and end) out of economic interests

I would dispute this very strongly, unless you simplify 'economic interests' to mean anything and everything that brings gain to anyone, at which case a politician starting a war solely for PR to stay in power would count as doing so for 'economic interests'.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

True, but even politicians can't start a war without incentivizing a whole machine of people to do it. And that power needs to come from somewhere and kept being fed.

The victor never really (or voluntary) leaves the spoils, or the land.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

From the outside looking in I eat this pill so much it's easy to swallow nowadays.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I wish, then the US would actually do what needs to be done

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

The free market will save us

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"By the capitalistic short term intrests of its politicians"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

That makes more sense

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I also know only the very basics of foreign policy. I guess when workers rise up and seize the means of production it’ll be a moot point.

“What do you have to lose?” - Donald Trump

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

much complicated, very nuance

[–] [email protected] -5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It is not all that bad. Wealth creation needs peace, rule of law and happy to spend consumers. I would be more afraid some ideological guy leading country towards what his ideology says it must be.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It is not all that bad. Wealth creation needs peace

All the wars for oil and other resources would disagree.

So would the obscene profits of the military industrial complex.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Sure, but nothing compares with WW2 and many wars triggered by the Cold War.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

"Stay still and let the peace sweep over you"