this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
288 points (93.6% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3491 readers
6 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 51 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Contenents are generally bigger than countries yes.

Here's an actual continent size comparison Contenent sizes

[–] [email protected] 59 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Except, that your picture shows the continents in the usual Mercator projection distorted way. This type of projection makes countries nearer to the poles look way larger than they actually are.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Antarctica is definitely not Mercator there!

And finding a good projection for the entirety of Asia would be difficult.

Now, using Mercator Russia in the OP image with Africa.... But I've already complained about that in two other crossposts ;-)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

I'll give you the point on Antarctica, but using multiple different projections is somehow even worse imho

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Any equal area projection recentered for each continent would work.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

here's a replica i just made using the equal earth projection

and here's one using the authagraph projection

i wanted to make one using the mollweide projection, but i couldn't find a good blank map with borders to use

they're both poor work, but i don't want to put in the effort to fix them, and it's pretty funny imagining icelanders getting mad that i put them in north america

both used blank world map images ripped from wikipedia plus getpaint.net

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Why does this image use the numbers for the entire US but only shows the continental US?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Came to the comments section to say this too. The contiguous States should also look visually smaller than China next to them, so I think they've blown them up to represent the full 9.8m km^2^.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Because if they were consistent or honest, they'd have to admit that the US is actuslly smaller than China (or Canada, which they chose to exclude).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I'd really love to see what Africa would look like without randomly created colonial superstates. I know Atlas Pro did a video about that, but not sure how accurate that is.

Also what Europe if every people group with a unintelligible dialect had a nation. Like Catalan, Occitan, Romansh, Bavarian etc.. Where I live the people in the next village over officially speak the same language, but it's completely unintelligible. So not a different language for political reasons only really.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Same for India, if the British never came what countries would exist in that region? All the states pretty much have different languages, cultures, food, politics, etc so it's more like an EU with a common military

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Also what Europe if every people group with a unintelligible dialect had a nation.

Papua New Guinea/Indonesia and Africa have like a thousand to a two thousand languages each, I think it'd be funnier doing that with them

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

In that case India would be a ton of tiny nations as well.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

It's fun to see how the shapes and areas change while moved around and being reprojected.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)
  • "excluding Russia"

  • includes Russia

I'm confused.

Or was there a text saying something like "all can fit in together, except Russia?"

Update. Didn't see the asterisk near the word Europe, was confused.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It is obviously talking about "the continent Europe, excluding Russia". What is there to be confused about?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Ahhh, I didn't notice the other asterisk near "Europe".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Honestly I missed the asterisk too, but I assumed instead something was cut from the screenshot.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The star is meant to point you at the compariosn to Europe which in this case does not include the european part of Russia.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Ah, struggled to find the asterisk near Europe word.

Thank you!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It's basically to make it clear and avoid confusion which can arise, e.g. by including only the European part of russia, as the Europe-Asia border is not uniquely defined.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Thanks! Didn't see the asterisk there

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm also interested in the true size comparison without the skewed size that occurs further and further from the equator when you make a flat, rectangular map from a sphere.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure, but I assume they've used some equal-area projection for the representation, so its angles are skewed, not the size.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Or just scaled the country images to match land area?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

On thetruesize.com they seem to use some equal-angle projection and the countries are reprojected while being moved. There, e.g. russia doesn't seem to be that narrow when placed on top of Africa.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Thx. I've corrected it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

LOL. Africa would be a tiny crumb in AUSTRALIA!

load more comments
view more: next ›