12
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

Wow, the libertarian magazine doesn't like tariffs??

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

As expected, the article doesn't even mention China's own extremely restrictive tariffs, including those on foreign-made cars.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Why would it? Reason has never targeted a Chinese audience.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Because context matters. In the same vein, the hidden and thereby illegal state subsidies Chinese electric car makers are receiving should also be mentioned. Biden's tariffs aren't happening in a vacuum.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

"Illegal state subsidies?" From whom?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I'll let you figure out where Chinese car makers are getting their subsidies from.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think their point is legality is relative ... surely what China is doing is legal in China. "Unreasonable" would be a better term than illegal.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Got it in one.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's not relative. The moment a Chinese good is being sold outside of China, it has to follow local laws, which includes laws against market manipulation. Chinese manufacturers and sellers have been ignoring them for a long time, but there is finally some pushback.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Not all that convincing, particularly when it draws quotes from other libertarian sources.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

Did you want communist sources?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Wait what source would you consider Communist outside of relevant state medias?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

anyone left of NewsMax

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Strangely, no notification of your response on my screen like I normally get from post responses.

Anyway, I'm just saying that an article from an expressively libertarian education platform citing an outwardly libertarian think tank is a double whammy of credibility degradation. A communist source would generally be bad, a communist source citing a communist source would be double bad. I just don't think publications with a proud ideological bent make for reliable sources, but that charge is less meaningful if they draw on information and content that is unaligned with their core beliefs.

this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
12 points (100.0% liked)

U.S. News

2186 readers
227 users here now

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.


Guidelines for submissions:

For World News, see the News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS