this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
12 points (67.6% liked)

Aussie Enviro

902 readers
7 users here now

An Australian community for everything from your backyard to beyond the black stump.

Topics may include Aussie plants and animals, environmental, farming, energy, and climate news and stories (mostly Aus specific), etc.

Want a news or information source? Try one of these links below!

News

The Conversation
(Environment)

The Guardian
(Environment)

ABC News
(Environment)

ABC News
(Science)

ABC News
(Rural)

Independent Australia
(Environment)

Michael West Media

The Fifth Estate

The New Daily
(Life, Science and Environment)

SBS News
(Environment)

The Saturday Paper
(Environment)

New Matilda
(Environment)

The Monthly
(Environment)

John Menadue
(Environment)

John Menadue
(Public Policy/Climate)

In Queensland
(News)

InDaily
(Science and Tech)

The AIMN
(Environment)

Westender (Environment and Climate)

Crikey
(Environment)

The Shot

4zzz
(News)

Sunshine Coast News
(News)

NoFibs

Sydney Morning Herald
(Environment)

The Age
(Environment)

Eureka Street
(Australia)

Open Forum

National Indigenous Times
(Environment)

The Independents

Science

Phys.org
(Australia)

Phys.org
(Australia and Environment)

Phys.org
(Plants and Animals)

Science.org
(News)

Particle.Scitech
(Earth)

Nature

CSIRO
(News)

AIMS
(News and Stories)

Botany.One

Science Daily (Environment)

Online Library.Wiley
(Search Earliest)

Online Library.Wiley

The BOM
(Media Releases)

Australia Institute
(News)

Science in Public
(Media Release)

Conservation

Nature Australia
(Newsroom)

Wilderness
(News/Events)

Australian Conservation Foundation ACF
(Media Releases)

Biodiversity Council
(Stories)

Conservatioon Council of WA
(News)

Marine Conservation
(Media Releases)

Greening Australia
(News/Media)

WWF, World-Wide Fund for Nature
(News)

WWF, World-Wide Fund for Nature
(Blogs)

Australian Wildlife
(News)

Nature Conservation Council for NSW
(Media)

Bob Brown
(Media)

Bush Heritage
(News)

Threatened Species Index (Updates)

Queensland Conservation Council
(Blog)

Greenpeace
(News)

Minderoo Foundation
(Media)

Tangaroa Blue
(Features)

Environmental Defenders Office
(Latest)

North East Forrest Alliance
(Media)

Aussie Bird Count
(Media)

Education Institutions

Australia National University
(News)

Science @ ANU
(News/Events)

University of Queensland
(News)

University of the Sunshine Coast
(News)

University of Technology, Sydney
(News)

University NSW
(Newsroom)

Queensland University of Technology
(News)

Griffith University
(News)

University of Southern Queensland
(News)

University of Melbourne
(Newsroom)

Monash
(Lens)

Southern Cross University
(Science)

RMIT
(News)

Macquarie University
(Lighthouse)

James Cook University
(This is Uni)

Charles Darwin University
(News)

University of Adelaide
(Environment News)

Deakin
(News and Media)

University of Newcastle
(Newsroom)

University of New England
(Connect)

University of Western Australia
(News)

Flinders
(News)

Murdoch
(News)

University of Western Sydney
(News Centre)

Curtin
(News)

Edith Cowan University
(Newsroom)

Charles Sturt University
(News)

University of Tasmania
(News and Stories)

University of South Australia
(News)

Trigger Warning: Community contains mostly bad environmental news (not by choice!). Community may also feature stories about animal agriculture and/or meat. Until tagging is available, please be aware and click accordingly.

Aussie Zone Rules.

  • Golden rule - be nice. If you wouldn’t say it in front of your ~~grandmother~~ favourite tree, don’t post it.
  • No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. You are allowed to denigrate invasive plants or animals.
  • Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here. Except invasive plants or animals.
  • No porn. Except photos of plants. Definitely not animals.
  • No Ads / Spamming. Except for photos or stories about plants and animals.
  • Nothing illegal in Australia. Like invasive plants or animals. Exotic microbes and invasive fungi also not welcome.
  • Make post titles descriptive with no swear words. Comments are a free for all using the above rules as a guide. Fuck invasive plants and animals.

Community and Server Info.

Banner Credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/takver/14871864504/

/c/Aussie Environment acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the land, sea and waters, of the area that we live and work on across Australia. We acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture and pay our respects to their Elders past and present.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

One of the world’s leading energy experts, and the man dubbed the “Einstein of energy efficiency” has debunked the claims that nuclear energy is essential to meet climate goals, saying that choosing nuclear over renewables and energy efficiency will make the climate crisis worse.

“Carbon-free power is necessary but not sufficient; we also need cheap and fast,” says Lovins, the co-founder of the Rocky Mountain Institute, now known as RMI, and who has been advising governments and companies on energy efficiency for half a century.

“We therefore need to count carbon and cost and speed. At actual market prices and deployment speeds, new nuclear plants would save manyfold less carbon per dollar and per year than cheaper, faster efficiency or modern renewables, thus making climate change worse.

“The more urgent you think climate change is, the more vital it is to buy cheap, fast, proven solutions—not costly, slow, speculative ones.”

The comments by Lovins, made in a keynote presentation at the annual Energy Efficiency Summit in Sydney on Wednesday, are particularly relevant in Australia, where one side of politics is threatening to stop wind, solar and storage, and tear up Commonwealth contracts, and keep coal generators open until such time that nuclear can be built.

The federal Coalition, and its conservative boosters in the media and so called think tanks, argue that nuclear is the best way to get to net zero by 2050, ignoring the pleas and warnings from climate scientists who say that unless emissions cuts are accelerated, then the planet has little chance of keeping average global warming below 2.0° or even 2.5°c.

A common refrain from the Coalition, and conservative parties across the world for that matter, is that nuclear should be included as part of an “all of the above” strategy. To be fair, it is also used by Labor when justifying their infatuation with fossil gas and its proposed future beyond 2050.

“When someone says climate change is so urgent that we need “all of the above,” remember Peter Bradford’s reply: “We’re not picking and backing winners. They don’t need it. We’re picking and backing losers.”

“That makes climate change worse,” Lovins says,. No proposed changes in size, technology, or fuel cycle would change these conclusions: they’re intrinsic to all nuclear technologies.”

He noted that renewables add as much capacity every few days as global nuclear power adds in a whole year. “Nuclear is a climate non-solution (that) isn’t worth paying for, let alone extra.

“Nuclear power has no business case or operational need. It offers no benefits for grid reliability or resilience justifying special treatment. In fact, its inflexibility and ungraceful failures complicate modern grid operations, and it hogs grid and market space that cheaper renewables are barred from contesting.”

Lovins says that grids in Europe have shown that renewable dominated grids can be run with great reliability “like a conductor with a symphony orchestra” with comparatively little storage, and little is needed if politicians and grid operators embraced the full potential of energy efficient and demand site incentives.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

I said it before and I'll say it again, nuclear proliferation and corruption are the only real reasons to build NPPs. If you build for the climate you build renewable!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I really don't like that writing style.

Even after reading all of it, I don't know who Lovins is. Had to re-read everything, because I thought I missed some information.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It's referring to Amory Lovins. But yeah, could have used a bit more context.