this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
23 points (96.0% liked)

memes

10334 readers
2074 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I'd rather have a 100km particle collider than an aircraft carrier.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

What if we build it on a 100km aircraft carrier? Think of the possibilities! heh

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In a ideal word, sure, I'd too. But we live among fucking beasts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Yeah, if history has taught as nothing else, it's that the guy with the biggest stick usually wins. There are many criticisms of the U.S. military, but no one could accuse it of being weak. That kind of deterrence is invaluable.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

As much as I love science, and I’d much rather see billions spent on a collider than war, I gotta admit this is funny as hell.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

we almost built a really fucking big collider in the US somewhere in the middle of fuck off land texas.

It died.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yep, that was when the US jumped the shark. It was the exact moment, Oct 20, 1993, we went "fuck science, we're only doing short term profits now."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

for context 22 billion is a few billions less than what elon musk overpaid for twitter. i don't think a bigger collider will do anything but I'd like for humanity to have this rather than whatever the fuck the rich are doing now.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah.... And at least this will generate jobs... And not reduce them like it did on Xitter.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Cern has produced quite some interesting systems for software and data management. I am sure the added value of the work is beyond just understanding particles.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

This is starting to turn into some Full Metal Alchemist shit. If you know, you know.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm waiting on the equatorial supercollider myself. 40,075km let's go!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Too small, we need to go bigger.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Ringworld collider, you say?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If scientists had their way they'd have built the big one first. Or at least something reasonably larger than what they have.. it's politics that is capitalism and war that is the addiction preventing us from having nice things

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I think the experience of building the previous smaller ones helped though. I think if you just go for the large one, it will probably fail or overrun the budget and we'll have nothing to show for the money spent.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Is not only about physics research. The complexity of those projects fund hundreds of sectors and push forward new technologies who will have many commercial use.

...Also they've confirmed the existence of this little thing called Higgs Boson which field define pretty much reality, soo... not exactly wasted time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Awesome. And with reality defined my daily existance and cost of living is. ... Exactly the same and killing me. 🙃

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Hopefully they can finally manufacture black holes. Because that would be totally safe for everyone 😉.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

They posit that yes, black holes could be formed, but they’re so small they evaporate pretty much instantly. They don’t have the mass to survive.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Shit Sabine Hossenfelder would say. (She funny tho..)

Edit: I had no idea about her questionable actions so that is news to me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

She also did an interview with a holocaust denier so…

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

Ok, that I didn't know. Off to find some references.

(I have fairly strong opinions about people like that. Hell, I refuse to watch any Tom Cruise movies because of his association with scientology, just as an example.)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You know what WOULD solve physics?

TRAINS

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

There's this (true) anecdote that precision measurements at CERN/LHC need to take into account the schedule of high-speed trains in the area because they cause tiny, yet measurable disturbances in the power grid.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What if they added smaller loops along the main loop, like a roller coaster with loopdy-loops? 🤔

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

There will be.

Colliders work best at specific speeds, like gears on a car. The big collider is fed by a smaller one. That one is likely fed by an even smaller one. Eventually, you get small enough that a simple linear accelerator can get the gas up to speed.

Oh, and likely a scientist/engineer grinning manically as they "push the trigger" on the largest rail gun in existence.