Poland is a NATO member. It’s a target with or without US weapons based there. What’s her point?
World News
News from around the world!
Exactly. The whole reason Poland wants them is because they've been invaded by Russia before and it's becomming aggressive again.
I'm against nuclear proliferation but this argument is ridiculous.
Agreed on all points.
Btw have I already told you I like your username? I tend to agree with your comments so it feels like it checks out in a weird way.
LOL! Thanks, same here about tending to agree.
The name is a hiking nickname. Apparently I have a talent for stating the obvious. :D
Now I'm picturing you hiking along saying things like "walking uphill is more tiring than walking downhill" or "that is a tree"!
ROFL! Sadly, you’re not far off the mark. :D
The struggle is real. I narrowly escape being nicknamed Sherlock for similar reasons.
"if you set up any defenses, we will target them when we attack"
Nukes in Poland would be very bad to apocalyptic in the event of a war, but also it's just passively dangerous; between 1950 and 1980, the US military reported on 32 accidents involving nuclear bombs, including 8 whose cores were not recovered. After which they stopped officially reporting them. The USSR/Russia's record is not significantly better.
That count does not include logistics mishaps, such as in 2007 when 6 nuclear bombs were accidentally shipped across the country and left attached to an unattended aircraft for 36 hours, at which point somebody asked why they had nuclear bombs just hanging off that plane without any guards or anything. No, this was not discovered because someone noticed their nukes were missing for a day and a half, this was discovered when someone stumbled across them.