The messaging on this topic is interesting
too doom and gloom and you can turn people off, since it seems hopeless. Too rosey, and you come across as a science-denying dolt.
The hedline+lede here seem to strike a nice balance.
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
The messaging on this topic is interesting
too doom and gloom and you can turn people off, since it seems hopeless. Too rosey, and you come across as a science-denying dolt.
The hedline+lede here seem to strike a nice balance.
They definitely tried to strike a balance but they didn't account for climate science itself tending to be too optimistic because certain mechanism may still be unknown. They didn't even mention the possibility of tipping points/runaway events. And they focused entirely on the electric grid (not on heating, transportation, agriculture, etc.).
I think they're right about electric grids overall getting cleaner though. Basically, I guess, we just need China to stop building coal plants at this point. That point can't be too far out, given the economies.