Cause the seems pretty nazi-like to me.

Again, highly reductive.

You can claim that modern Israel is a fascist state, and that fascist states behave in similar ways. However, just calling it Nazism ignores the working history of both political ideologies.

The whole point is that for one to equate Zionism to Nazism requires you to ignore decades of historical context. Furthermore, equating Ukraine to a Nazi state ignores the fact that the vast majority (up to 7 million) Ukrainians fought for the Soviet Union in WW2 against the Nazi.

Zionism is about Jews having land.

Again, highly reductive. This is minimalizing the hundreds of years of pogroms across Europe and Asia the Jews endured, resulting in the inception of Zionism in the 1800s.

I wonder, who wanted to give Jews Madagascar? 😲

Did you not read? I told you it was one of the Nazi schemes to answer "the Jewish problem" while stealing their wealth to redistribute among party members.

I'm not saying you can't correctly compare aspects of Zionism to Nazi Fascism. I'm saying that you can't equate the two to be the same thing.

Zionism's popularity among Jewish communities in Europe didn't become popular until the rise of Nazism in Germany. It didn't become popular in Asia until the Soviets began forced deportations after the doctor's plot.

Ignoring the actual historical context, just logically it's full of internal contradictions. If Zionism predates Nazism by a hundred years, wouldn't they be the ones who invented fascism?

You are accidentally supporting actual Nazi propaganda about the Zionist intentions for turning Germany into their new homeland.

Again, I'm not saying that I support Zionism, I don't even support fucking borders. It's just that if we continue utilizing Nazism for every argument, it loses it inherent meaning, thus giving cover to actual practicing Nazis.

I do however think it's important to discus how fascist governments create fascist governments. It's actually something Hitler and mousseline talked about, that to fight against fascism a governments only response is to become more militaristic, and thus more fascist.

No it doesn't. Fascism as definition uses what suits them best and what's give them power, they are opportunists. The church was a good way for them.

Lol, no true Scott's man for secularism?

Hard to be nice colonialists though.

Again, are all forms of colonialism fascist......?

Ok , if you like to split hairs, biggest funders of the state of Israel and it's colonies at its formation.

Splitting hairs? The whole point of me saying you're being reductive is that you are ignoring large swaths of historical context.

biggest funders of the state of Israel and it's colonies at its formation.

Israel was formed in 1948, three years after the fall of the Nazi party......

The largest state contributor during the formation of Israel was Britain. They were in control of Palestine at the end of the war, not Germany.

I think you are recalling the Nazis "attempt" to relocate Jews to places outside Europe, including places like Palestine and Madagascar . The Nazi made several schemes to deport "willing" Jews prior to WW2, in reality they were just schemes to seize assets before the Jews left the country.

Google generic fascism. And nazi support for Israel.

Perhaps read more material about Haavaar agreement than a quick Google search?

The Germans weren't funding Zionism, the Jews being forced to leave the country were, and the vast majority of property seized from the Jews never made it to Palestine.